Join IIUG
 for   
 

Informix News
18 Nov 13 - ZDNet - Top 20 mobile skills in demand... Read
09 Sep 13 - telecompaper - Shaspa and Tatung have shown a new smart home platform at Ifa in Berlin. Powered by the IBM Informix software... Read
06 Sep 13 - IBM data magazine - Mission Accomplished - Miami, Florida will be the backdrop for the 2014 IIUG Informix Conference... Read
01 Feb 13 - IBM Data Magazine - Are your database backups safe? Lester Knutsen (IBM Champion) writes about database back up safety using "archecker"... Read
14 Nov 12 - IBM - IBM's Big Data For Smart Grid Goes Live In Texas... Read
3 Oct 12 - The Financial - IBM and TransWorks Collaborate to Help Louisiana-Pacific Corporation Achieve Supply Chain Efficiency... Read
28 Aug 12 - techCLOUD9 - Splunk kicks up a SaaS Storm... Read
10 Aug 12 - businessCLOUD9 - Is this the other half of Cloud monitoring?... Read
3 Aug 12 - IBM data management - Supercharging the data warehouse while keeping costs down IBM Informix Warehouse Accelerator (IWA) delivers superior performance for in-memory analytics processing... Read
2 Aug 12 - channelbiz - Oninit Group launches Pay Per Pulse cloud-based service... Read
28 May 12 - Bloor - David Norfolk on the recent Informix benchmark "pretty impressive results"... Read
23 May 12 - DBTA - Informix Genero: A Way to Modernize Informix 4GL Applications... Read
9 Apr 12 - Mastering Data Management - Upping the Informix Ante: Advanced Data Tools... Read
22 Mar 12 - developerWorks - Optimizing Informix database access... Read
14 Mar 12 - BernieSpang.com - International Informix User Group set to meet in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - IIUG Heads West for 2012 - Get ready for sun and sand in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - Running Informix on Solid-State Drives.Speed Up Database Access... Read
26 Feb 12 - BernieSpan.com - Better results, lower cost for a broad set of new IBM clients and partners... Read
24 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Informix Warehouse Accelerator: Continuous Acceleration during Data Refresh... Read
6 Feb 12 - PRLOG - Informix port delivers unlimited database scalability for popular SaaS application ... Read
2 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Loading data with the IBM Informix TimeSeries Plug-in for Data Studio... Read
1 Feb 12 - developerWorks - 100 Tech Tips, #47: Log-in to Fix Central... Read
13 Jan 12 - MC Press online - Informix Dynamic Server Entices New Users with Free Production Edition ... Read
11 Jan 12 - Computerworld - Ecologic Analytics and Landis+Gyr -- Suitors Decide to Tie the Knot... Read
9 Jan 12 - planetIDS.com - DNS impact on Informix / Impacto do DNS no Informix... Read
8 Sep 11 - TMCnet.com - IBM Offers Database Solution to Enable Smart Meter Data Capture... Read
1 Aug 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Happy 10th anniversary to IBM and Informix... Read
8 Jul 11 - Database Trends and Applications - Managing Time Series Data with Informix... Read
31 May 11 - Smart Grid - The meter data management pitfall utilities are overlooking... Read
27 May 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Big data, big time ( Series data, warehouse acceleration, and 4GLs )... Read
16 May 11 - Business Wire - HiT Software Announces DBMoto for Enterprise Integration, Adds Informix. Log-based Change Data Capture... Read
21 Mar 11 - Yahoo! Finance - IBM and Cable&Wireless Worldwide Announce UK Smart Energy Cloud... Read
14 Mar 11 - MarketWatch - Fuzzy Logix and IBM Unveil In-Database Analytics for IBM Informix... Read
11 Mar 11 - InvestorPlace - It's Time to Give IBM Props: How many tech stocks are up 53% since the dot-com boom?... Read
9 Mar 11 - DBTA - Database Administration and the Goal of Diminishing Downtime... Read
2 Feb 11 - DBTAs - Informix 11.7 Flexible Grid Provides a Different Way of Looking at Database Servers... Read
27 Jan 11 - exactsolutions - Exact to Add Informix Support to Database Replay, SQL Monitoring Solutions... Read
25 Jan 11 - PR Newswire - Bank of China in the UK Works With IBM to Become a Smarter, Greener Bank... Read
12 Oct 10 - Database Trends and Applications - Informix 11.7: The Beginning of the Next Decade of IBM Informix... Read
20 Sep 10 - planetIDS.com - ITG analyst paper: Cost/Benefit case for IBM Informix as compared to Microsoft SQL Server... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - IBM Informix Choice Edition V11.50 helps deploy low-cost scalable and reliable solutions for Apple Macintosh and Microsoft Windows... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - Software withdrawal: Elite Support for Informix Ultimate-C Edition... Read
24 May 10 - eWeek Europe - IBM Supplies Database Tech For EU Smart Grid... Read
23 May 10 - SiliconIndia - IBM's smart metering system allows wise use of energy... Read
21 May 10 - CNET - IBM to help people monitor energy use... Read
20 May 10 - ebiz - IBM Teams With Hildebrand To Bring Smart Metering To Homes Across Britain... Read
19 May 10 - The New Blog Times - Misurare il consumo energetico: DEHEMS è pronto... Read
19 May 10 - ZDNet - IBM software in your home? Pact enables five-city smart meter pilot in Europe... Read
17 March 10 - ZDNet (blog) David Morgenstern - TCO: New research finds Macs in the enterprise easier, cheaper to manage than... Read
17 March 2010 - Virtualization Review - ...key components of Big Blue's platform to the commercial cloud such as its WebSphere suite of application ser vers and its DB2 and Informix databases... Read
10 February 2010 - The Wall Street Journal - International Business Machines is expanding an initiative to win over students and professors on its products. How do they lure the college crowd?... Read


End of Support Dates

IIUG on Facebook IIUG on Twitter

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum

Re: ONCONFIG comments

Posted By: Jack Parker
Date: Wednesday, 11 May 2005, at 5:35 a.m.

In Response To: ONCONFIG comments (Bono Vox)

Comments embedded.

If somebody told me to change my $ONCONFIG, I'd take it with a large grain
of salt and check up on every parameter they suggested I modify. I'd then
make the changes one at a time and see how each one worked differently.

Looks like an OLTP instance. Also looks like you're sharing the box with
something else? Doesn't quite make sense, you've got 12GB of memory and
connections for 1500 users, and yet you appear to be only allocating 500MB
or so for the instance.

j.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bono Vox" <in4mixperu@hotmail.com>
To: <ids@iiug.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 4:00 AM
Subject: ONCONFIG comments [4891]


[...]

> ============================================================
> HP-UX 11.11 (64 bits)
> 4 CPU's
> 12 GB Memory
> Array VA7400
> Informix 7.31 FD8
> ============================================================
>
> ONCONFIG
> =======
>
> # Root Dbspace Configuration
>
> ROOTNAME rootdbs # Root dbspace name
> ROOTPATH /dev/informix/nazcasysch01 # Path for device containing
> root dbspace

I trust this is a symbolic link.

> ROOTOFFSET 0 # Offset of root
> dbspace into device (Kbytes)

I've never been keen on offset 0, some drives consider the first couple of
KB as their own - I have seen this wipe out instances in the past. I
usually go for an offset of 40.

> ROOTSIZE 204800 # Size of root
dbspace
> (Kbytes)

Seems a little small, but if it is sufficient...

>
> # Disk Mirroring Configuration Parameters
>
> MIRROR 1 # Mirroring flag (Yes = 1, No = 0)
> MIRRORPATH # Path for device containing mirrored root
> MIRROROFFSET 0 # Offset into mirrored device (Kbytes)

??? You have mirroring turned on, but no device specified to mirror to. I
would think this would generate an error during instance startup.

>
> # Physical Log Configuration
>
> PHYSDBS phydbs # Location (dbspace) of physical log
> PHYSFILE 64000 # Physical log file size (Kbytes)

I would check the sizing of this by checking Checkpoint frequency in your
log.

>
> # Logical Log Configuration
>
> LOGFILES 80 # Number of logical log files
> LOGSIZE 32768 # Logical log size (Kbytes)

Quite a few of these. Does this indicate that you aren't backing them off
as fast as they fill? How many are full when the backup comes to town?

[...]

> TBLSPACE_STATS 1

If you are using table space statistics then this is fine, but othetrwise it
is overhead and you might want to go back to 0.

>
> # System Archive Tape Device
>
> TAPEDEV /dev/rmt/2m # Tape device path
> #TAPEDEV /dev/rmt/2m # Tape device path
> TAPEBLK 4000 # Tape block size (Kbytes)
> TAPESIZE 40000000 # Maximum amount of data to put
> on tape (Kbytes)

Doesn't look like a no-rewind device, are you using this for backups?

>
> # Log Archive Tape Device
>
> LTAPEDEV /dev/rmt/2m # Log tape device path
> #LTAPEDEV /dev/rmt/2m # Log tape device path
> LTAPEBLK 4000 # Log tape block size (Kbytes)
> LTAPESIZE 40000000 # Max amount of data to put on log tape
> (Kbytes)

Looks like the same device. Are you using logging?

[...]

> NETTYPE ipcshm,3,250,CPU # Configure poll thread(s) for
nettype
> NETTYPE soctcp,3,250,CPU # Configure poll thread(s) for
nettype

While of minimal impact, still this is 6 processes to handle user
connections, 3 shared memory and 3 network. Check how many users you
actually have and adjust accordingly.

> DEADLOCK_TIMEOUT 60 # Max time to wait of lock in
> distributed env.
> RESIDENT 0 # Forced residency flag (Yes =
> 1, No = 0)

Not resident? Check release notes and see if there is an issue with
residency on this platform.

>
> MULTIPROCESSOR 1 # 0 for single-processor, 1 for
> multi-processor
> NUMCPUVPS 3 # Number of user (cpu) vps

If this were Solaris, I'd bump this to 4.

> SINGLE_CPU_VP 0 # If non-zero, limit number of cpu vps
> to one
>
> NOAGE 0 # Process aging
> AFF_SPROC 0 # Affinity start processor
> AFF_NPROCS 0 # Affinity number of processors

I've forgotten if NOAGE should be 1 or 0 - again this is something you'd
check release notes for. You might also want to affinitize the processors.

>
> # Shared Memory Parameters
>
> LOCKS 1024000 # Maximum number of locks
> BUFFERS 850000 # Maximum number of shared buffers
> NUMAIOVPS 1 # Number of IO vps

Are you using KIO? (that's what this would seem to indicate) check queue
length for your AIO processor. If long, you might want to add to this.

> PHYSBUFF 512 # Physical log buffer size (Kbytes)
> LOGBUFF 512 # Logical log buffer size (Kbytes)

Again, minimal effect - check the usage of your buffers.

> LOGSMAX 100 # Maximum number of logical log files
> CLEANERS 64 # Number of buffer cleaner processes

That's pretty hefty. Seems larger than would be required given the small
size of your memory footprint.

> SHMBASE 0x0 # Shared memory base address
> SHMVIRTSIZE 393216 # initial virtual shared memory segment
size
> SHMADD 131072 # Size of new shared memory segments
> (Kbytes)

Check your memory usage - are you adding a lot of memory segments? If so,
resize your SHMVIRT to try to get a single chunk of memory instead of a lot
of little ones.

> SHMTOTAL 0 # Total shared memory (Kbytes).
0=>unlimited

If you are sharing the box, then you might not want unlimited memory going
to the instance.

> CKPTINTVL 300 # Check point interval (in sec)
> LRUS 64 # Number of LRU queues
> LRU_MAX_DIRTY 10 # LRU percent dirty begin cleaning limit
> LRU_MIN_DIRTY 5 # LRU percent dirty end cleaning limit

Check how many foreground writes you are doing to tune this.

> LTXHWM 50 # Long transaction high water mark
> percentage
> LTXEHWM 60 # Long transaction high water mark
> (exclusive)

Look like the default values. Generally nothing wrong with that.

[...]

> # Backup/Restore variables
> BAR_ACT_LOG /usr/informix/log/bar_act_nazca.log
> BAR_MAX_BACKUP 0
> BAR_RETRY 1
> BAR_NB_XPORT_COUNT 10
> BAR_XFER_BUF_SIZE 31
> # BAR_DEBUG 9
> BAR_DEBUG_LOG /usr/informix/log/bar_debug.log

Ah. good.

[...]

> # Read Ahead Variables
> RA_PAGES 32 # Number of pages to attempt to read ahead
> RA_THRESHOLD 30 # Number of pages left before next group

Check how much of your read ahead you are using. If you have a lot of
users, this may be too high. For DSS this is too low.

[...]

> DBSPACETEMP temporal1,temporl2 # Default temp dbspaces

I'd have gone for 8 of these with 4 CPUs. How is temp performing?

[...]

> # Parallel Database Queries (pdq)
> MAX_PDQPRIORITY 80 # Maximum allowed pdqpriority
> DS_MAX_QUERIES 20 # Maximum number of decision support
queries
> DS_TOTAL_MEMORY 102400 # Decision support memory (Kbytes)
> DS_MAX_SCANS 1048576 # Maximum number of decision support scans
> DATASKIP off # List of dbspaces to skip

100 MB for DSS stuff. Won't get you very far - how is it performing?

[deletia]


Messages In This Thread

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 5.12.