Join IIUG
 for   
 

Informix News
18 Nov 13 - ZDNet - Top 20 mobile skills in demand... Read
09 Sep 13 - telecompaper - Shaspa and Tatung have shown a new smart home platform at Ifa in Berlin. Powered by the IBM Informix software... Read
06 Sep 13 - IBM data magazine - Mission Accomplished - Miami, Florida will be the backdrop for the 2014 IIUG Informix Conference... Read
01 Feb 13 - IBM Data Magazine - Are your database backups safe? Lester Knutsen (IBM Champion) writes about database back up safety using "archecker"... Read
14 Nov 12 - IBM - IBM's Big Data For Smart Grid Goes Live In Texas... Read
3 Oct 12 - The Financial - IBM and TransWorks Collaborate to Help Louisiana-Pacific Corporation Achieve Supply Chain Efficiency... Read
28 Aug 12 - techCLOUD9 - Splunk kicks up a SaaS Storm... Read
10 Aug 12 - businessCLOUD9 - Is this the other half of Cloud monitoring?... Read
3 Aug 12 - IBM data management - Supercharging the data warehouse while keeping costs down IBM Informix Warehouse Accelerator (IWA) delivers superior performance for in-memory analytics processing... Read
2 Aug 12 - channelbiz - Oninit Group launches Pay Per Pulse cloud-based service... Read
28 May 12 - Bloor - David Norfolk on the recent Informix benchmark "pretty impressive results"... Read
23 May 12 - DBTA - Informix Genero: A Way to Modernize Informix 4GL Applications... Read
9 Apr 12 - Mastering Data Management - Upping the Informix Ante: Advanced Data Tools... Read
22 Mar 12 - developerWorks - Optimizing Informix database access... Read
14 Mar 12 - BernieSpang.com - International Informix User Group set to meet in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - IIUG Heads West for 2012 - Get ready for sun and sand in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - Running Informix on Solid-State Drives.Speed Up Database Access... Read
26 Feb 12 - BernieSpan.com - Better results, lower cost for a broad set of new IBM clients and partners... Read
24 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Informix Warehouse Accelerator: Continuous Acceleration during Data Refresh... Read
6 Feb 12 - PRLOG - Informix port delivers unlimited database scalability for popular SaaS application ... Read
2 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Loading data with the IBM Informix TimeSeries Plug-in for Data Studio... Read
1 Feb 12 - developerWorks - 100 Tech Tips, #47: Log-in to Fix Central... Read
13 Jan 12 - MC Press online - Informix Dynamic Server Entices New Users with Free Production Edition ... Read
11 Jan 12 - Computerworld - Ecologic Analytics and Landis+Gyr -- Suitors Decide to Tie the Knot... Read
9 Jan 12 - planetIDS.com - DNS impact on Informix / Impacto do DNS no Informix... Read
8 Sep 11 - TMCnet.com - IBM Offers Database Solution to Enable Smart Meter Data Capture... Read
1 Aug 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Happy 10th anniversary to IBM and Informix... Read
8 Jul 11 - Database Trends and Applications - Managing Time Series Data with Informix... Read
31 May 11 - Smart Grid - The meter data management pitfall utilities are overlooking... Read
27 May 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Big data, big time ( Series data, warehouse acceleration, and 4GLs )... Read
16 May 11 - Business Wire - HiT Software Announces DBMoto for Enterprise Integration, Adds Informix. Log-based Change Data Capture... Read
21 Mar 11 - Yahoo! Finance - IBM and Cable&Wireless Worldwide Announce UK Smart Energy Cloud... Read
14 Mar 11 - MarketWatch - Fuzzy Logix and IBM Unveil In-Database Analytics for IBM Informix... Read
11 Mar 11 - InvestorPlace - It's Time to Give IBM Props: How many tech stocks are up 53% since the dot-com boom?... Read
9 Mar 11 - DBTA - Database Administration and the Goal of Diminishing Downtime... Read
2 Feb 11 - DBTAs - Informix 11.7 Flexible Grid Provides a Different Way of Looking at Database Servers... Read
27 Jan 11 - exactsolutions - Exact to Add Informix Support to Database Replay, SQL Monitoring Solutions... Read
25 Jan 11 - PR Newswire - Bank of China in the UK Works With IBM to Become a Smarter, Greener Bank... Read
12 Oct 10 - Database Trends and Applications - Informix 11.7: The Beginning of the Next Decade of IBM Informix... Read
20 Sep 10 - planetIDS.com - ITG analyst paper: Cost/Benefit case for IBM Informix as compared to Microsoft SQL Server... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - IBM Informix Choice Edition V11.50 helps deploy low-cost scalable and reliable solutions for Apple Macintosh and Microsoft Windows... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - Software withdrawal: Elite Support for Informix Ultimate-C Edition... Read
24 May 10 - eWeek Europe - IBM Supplies Database Tech For EU Smart Grid... Read
23 May 10 - SiliconIndia - IBM's smart metering system allows wise use of energy... Read
21 May 10 - CNET - IBM to help people monitor energy use... Read
20 May 10 - ebiz - IBM Teams With Hildebrand To Bring Smart Metering To Homes Across Britain... Read
19 May 10 - The New Blog Times - Misurare il consumo energetico: DEHEMS è pronto... Read
19 May 10 - ZDNet - IBM software in your home? Pact enables five-city smart meter pilot in Europe... Read
17 March 10 - ZDNet (blog) David Morgenstern - TCO: New research finds Macs in the enterprise easier, cheaper to manage than... Read
17 March 2010 - Virtualization Review - ...key components of Big Blue's platform to the commercial cloud such as its WebSphere suite of application ser vers and its DB2 and Informix databases... Read
10 February 2010 - The Wall Street Journal - International Business Machines is expanding an initiative to win over students and professors on its products. How do they lure the college crowd?... Read


End of Support Dates

IIUG on Facebook IIUG on Twitter

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum

RE: Poor performance on VMWare

Posted By: JAVIER PEREZ ARENAL
Date: Wednesday, 28 May 2014, at 11:04 a.m.

In Response To: RE: Poor performance on VMWare (Alexandre Marini)

Thanks Alexandre!

I will follow your advices, but IMHO I do not expect any significative per=
formance improvements. The IDS version is the same in the two servers and i=
n both I use cooked files, therefore, I supose that if I move the dbspaces =
to raw devices in both servers, the improvements will be equivalent too.

Again, thanks for your help.

Best regards.

--
Javier Perez Arenal - jperez@uniovi.es
Jefe del Area T=E9cnica de Inform=E1tica y Comunicaciones=20
Vicerrectorado de Campus, Inform=E1tica e Infraestructuras
Universidad de Oviedo=20
Edificio Severo Ochoa=20
C/ Fernando Bongera s/n, Campus del Cristo
33006 - Oviedo, Asturias

-----Mensaje original-----
De: ids-bounces@iiug.org [mailto:ids-bounces@iiug.org] En nombre de Alexand=
re Marini
Enviado el: lunes, 26 de mayo de 2014 16:26
Para: ids@iiug.org
Asunto: RE: Poor performance on VMWare [33100]

Hello, Javier.=20
My personal opinion is that you might have a better performance, but you sh=
ould not use the same onconfig file.=20

1) Are you really using cooked files? If so, please forget them. Change you=
r chunks to raw devices, and make sure you are not using a bad RAID level i=
n your storage.=20

2) You could start a performance tunning process after topic 1 is solved.=20
Informix 12 have several features that might benefit your performance, even=
in VMs environments. Eg: are you using cpu vp memory caches? Are you using=
RTO policies? Are you using alice index cleaner mode (OLTP system)?=20

3) You might also check other topics, but as a start phase, I=B4d go for al=
l of mentioned ones first.=20

Hope it helps.=20
Regards.=20

Alexandre Marini
IBM Informix Certified Professional v10 / v11.50 / v11.70 / v12.10=20

IBM Information Management Informix Technical Professional=20

IBM Infosphere DataStage Technical Professional Informix Senior DBA - Orizo=
n Brasil BRIUG website administrator Informix independent consultant=20

> To: ids@iiug.org
> From: jperez@uniovi.es
> Subject: Poor performance on VMWare [33099]
> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 09:44:07 -0400
>=20
> Hello
>=20
> I want to know some expert opinion about one IDS 12.10.FC3WE test that=20
> I ha=3D ve currently executing in two machines. This machines are:
>=20
> SRV1: (+7 years old) HP Proliant DL585 G1
> - 4xAMD Opteron 820 2.3GHz (2 cores x processor for a total of 8=20
> cores)
> - 16 GB RAM
> - Local HDD on 146GB Ultra320 SCSI
> - Informix storage: cooked files
> - Red Hat 5.9 x64
>=20
> SRV2: VMWare Virtual server
> - 8xvCPU (reported as AMD Opteron 6176 SE 2,3GHz)
> - 16 GB RAM
> - SAN (HP EVA6500) HDD on 2TB 7.2K EVA SAS MDL disk pool (Mapped RAW=20
> LUN)
> - SAN conectivity: 1Gbps iSCSI (server side) 10Gbps (SAN side)
> - Informix storage: cooked files
> - Red Hat 6.5 x64
>=20
> With these technical data, I am expected that the SRV2 results were=20
> better =3D than the SRV2 ones (and more knowing the SRV1 "age").
>=20
> When I ran some scripts, stored procedures (SPL) and update=20
> statistics, I w=3D as surprised by the results. The massive write=20
> operations were slightly bet=3D ter on SRV2 (import was 40% faster in=20
> SRV2), but the scripts envolving heav=3D y reading operations were about=
=20
> 1,5 times slow in the best cases, reaching =3D
> 2,5 times slow in the worse cases.=20
>=20
> In this unexpected scenario, I looked for an IDS independent=20
> benchmarking t=3D ool and I found a suite called "phoronix test suite"=20
> (PTS). I was decided t=3D o find the bottleneck in SRV2... but again the=
=20
> results of the PTS surprised=3D me. I ran various test, with the followin=
g results:
>=20
> - pts/SmallPT (CPU test. Less is better) > SRV1: 192 > SRV2: 141=20
> (better)
> - pts/Apache (CPU test. More is better) > SRV1: 7017.65 > SRV2:=20
> 9547.57 (be=3D
> tter)
> - pts/aio-stress (I/O test. Random Write. More is better) > SRV1:=20
> 22.06 > S=3D
> RV2: 881.51 (better)
> - pts/iozone (I/O test. Read Performance: 1MB record / 2GB file. More=20
> is be=3D
> tter) > SRV1: 728.09 > SRV2: 2008.14 (better)
> - pts/iozone (I/O test. Read Performance: 1MB record / 4GB file. More=20
> is be=3D
> tter) > SRV1: 824.98 > SRV2: 1985.23 (better)
> - pts/iozone (I/O test. Read Performance: 1MB record / 8GB file. More=20
> is be=3D
> tter) > SRV1: 768.30 > SRV2: 1906.90(better)
> - pts/iozone (I/O test. Read Performance: 4KB record / 2GB file. More=20
> is be=3D
> tter) > SRV1: 1016.75 > SRV2: 2113.92 (better)
> - pts/iozone (I/O test. Read Performance: 4KB record / 4GB file. More=20
> is be=3D
> tter) > SRV1: 1071.86 > SRV2: 1953.93 (better)
> - pts/iozone (I/O test. Read Performance: 4KB record / 8GB file. More=20
> is be=3D
> tter) > SRV1: 1086.07 > SRV2: 1794.42 (better)
> - pts/iozone (I/O test. Write Performance: 1MB record / 2GB file. More=20
> is b=3D
> etter) > SRV1: 25.38 > SRV2: 97.64 (better)
> - pts/iozone (I/O test. Write Performance: 1MB record / 4GB file. More=20
> is b=3D
> etter) > SRV1: 26.28 > SRV2: 114.04 (better)
> - pts/iozone (I/O test. Write Performance: 1MB record / 8GB file. More=20
> is b=3D
> etter) > SRV1: 28.36 > SRV2: 144.49 (better)
> - pts/iozone (I/O test. Write Performance: 4KB record / 2GB file. More=20
> is b=3D
> etter) > SRV1: 26.17 > SRV2: 91.99 (better)
> - pts/iozone (I/O test. Write Performance: 4KB record / 4GB file. More=20
> is b=3D
> etter) > SRV1: 26.35 > SRV2: 108.19 (better)
> - pts/iozone (I/O test. Write Performance: 4KB record / 8GB file. More=20
> is b=3D
> etter) > SRV1: 28.62 > SRV2: 144.37 (better)
> - pts/ramspeed (RAM test. Add integer. More is better) > SRV1: 3533.75=20
> > SR=3D
> V2: 6782.31 (better)
> - pts/ramspeed (RAM test. Copy integer. More is better) > SRV1:=20
> 3418.95 > S=3D
> RV2: 6782.31 (better)
> - pts/ramspeed (RAM test. Scale integer. More is better) > SRV1:=20
> 3448.33 > =3D
> SRV2: 6776.20 (better)
> - pts/ramspeed (RAM test. Triad integer. More is better) > SRV1:=20
> 3499.36 > =3D
> SRV2: 6536.23 (better)
> - pts/ramspeed (RAM test. Average integer. More is better) > SRV1:=20
> 3453.82 =3D
> > SRV2: 6851.13 (better)
> - pts/ramspeed (RAM test. Add floating point. More is better) > SRV1:=20
> 3955.=3D
> 16 > SRV2: 7241.65 (better)
> - pts/ramspeed (RAM test. Copy floating point. More is better) > SRV1:=20
> 3599=3D
> ..66 > SRV2: 7178.45 (better)
> - pts/ramspeed (RAM test. Scale floating point. More is better) >=20
> SRV1: 339=3D
> 9.08 > SRV2: 7286.11 (better)
> - pts/ramspeed (RAM test. Triad floating point. More is better) >=20
> SRV1: 385=3D
> 5.18 > SRV2: 7461.69 (better)
> - pts/ramspeed (RAM test. Average floating point. More is better) >=20
> SRV1: 3=3D
> 647.64 > SRV2: 7351.95 (better)
>=20
> In these test, SRV2 outperforms SRV1 in a clear and consistent way in=20
> any o=3D f the evaluated fields (Processor, I/O and Memory). But the IDS=
=20
> 12.10.FC3WE=3D still runs slowly in SRV2 when I execute massive read=20
> operations (by examp=3D le, update statistics over my test db is 136%=20
> more slow than the same opera=3D tion on SRV1). The IDS config is=20
> exactly the same in the two servers (oncon=3D fig copied from one to othe=
r).
>=20
> One thing I observed is that the SRV2's virtual processors shows more=20
> activ=3D ity than the SRV1's ones when I execute any IDS operation. Also=
=20
> is the same=3D thing with the "top" utility in the operating system=20
> command line. This is=3D a "contradiction?" with the SRV2's better PTS CP=
U tests .
>=20
> I do not identify or suspect any possible reason who explain the poor=20
> SRV2 =3D performance... any ideas?
>=20
> Thanks in advance and excuse me if the english is not quite good...=20
> :-(
>=20
> --
> Javier Perez Arenal - jperez@uniovi.es<mailto:jperez@uniovi.es>
> Jefe del Area T=3DE9cnica de Inform=3DE1tica y Comunicaciones=20
> Vicerrectorado de Campus, Inform=3DE1tica e Infraestructuras Universidad=
=20
> de Oviedo Edificio Severo Ochoa C/ Fernando Bongera s/n, Campus del=20
> Cristo
> 33006 - Oviedo, Asturias
>=20
> --Boundary_(ID_B1ApZu83LpmDOByskPtisQ)
>=20
>=20
>=20
***************************************************************************=
****=20
> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.=20
>=20

***************************************************************************=
****
Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.=20

Messages In This Thread

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 5.12.