Join IIUG
 for   
 

Informix News
18 Nov 13 - ZDNet - Top 20 mobile skills in demand... Read
09 Sep 13 - telecompaper - Shaspa and Tatung have shown a new smart home platform at Ifa in Berlin. Powered by the IBM Informix software... Read
06 Sep 13 - IBM data magazine - Mission Accomplished - Miami, Florida will be the backdrop for the 2014 IIUG Informix Conference... Read
01 Feb 13 - IBM Data Magazine - Are your database backups safe? Lester Knutsen (IBM Champion) writes about database back up safety using "archecker"... Read
14 Nov 12 - IBM - IBM's Big Data For Smart Grid Goes Live In Texas... Read
3 Oct 12 - The Financial - IBM and TransWorks Collaborate to Help Louisiana-Pacific Corporation Achieve Supply Chain Efficiency... Read
28 Aug 12 - techCLOUD9 - Splunk kicks up a SaaS Storm... Read
10 Aug 12 - businessCLOUD9 - Is this the other half of Cloud monitoring?... Read
3 Aug 12 - IBM data management - Supercharging the data warehouse while keeping costs down IBM Informix Warehouse Accelerator (IWA) delivers superior performance for in-memory analytics processing... Read
2 Aug 12 - channelbiz - Oninit Group launches Pay Per Pulse cloud-based service... Read
28 May 12 - Bloor - David Norfolk on the recent Informix benchmark "pretty impressive results"... Read
23 May 12 - DBTA - Informix Genero: A Way to Modernize Informix 4GL Applications... Read
9 Apr 12 - Mastering Data Management - Upping the Informix Ante: Advanced Data Tools... Read
22 Mar 12 - developerWorks - Optimizing Informix database access... Read
14 Mar 12 - BernieSpang.com - International Informix User Group set to meet in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - IIUG Heads West for 2012 - Get ready for sun and sand in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - Running Informix on Solid-State Drives.Speed Up Database Access... Read
26 Feb 12 - BernieSpan.com - Better results, lower cost for a broad set of new IBM clients and partners... Read
24 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Informix Warehouse Accelerator: Continuous Acceleration during Data Refresh... Read
6 Feb 12 - PRLOG - Informix port delivers unlimited database scalability for popular SaaS application ... Read
2 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Loading data with the IBM Informix TimeSeries Plug-in for Data Studio... Read
1 Feb 12 - developerWorks - 100 Tech Tips, #47: Log-in to Fix Central... Read
13 Jan 12 - MC Press online - Informix Dynamic Server Entices New Users with Free Production Edition ... Read
11 Jan 12 - Computerworld - Ecologic Analytics and Landis+Gyr -- Suitors Decide to Tie the Knot... Read
9 Jan 12 - planetIDS.com - DNS impact on Informix / Impacto do DNS no Informix... Read
8 Sep 11 - TMCnet.com - IBM Offers Database Solution to Enable Smart Meter Data Capture... Read
1 Aug 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Happy 10th anniversary to IBM and Informix... Read
8 Jul 11 - Database Trends and Applications - Managing Time Series Data with Informix... Read
31 May 11 - Smart Grid - The meter data management pitfall utilities are overlooking... Read
27 May 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Big data, big time ( Series data, warehouse acceleration, and 4GLs )... Read
16 May 11 - Business Wire - HiT Software Announces DBMoto for Enterprise Integration, Adds Informix. Log-based Change Data Capture... Read
21 Mar 11 - Yahoo! Finance - IBM and Cable&Wireless Worldwide Announce UK Smart Energy Cloud... Read
14 Mar 11 - MarketWatch - Fuzzy Logix and IBM Unveil In-Database Analytics for IBM Informix... Read
11 Mar 11 - InvestorPlace - It's Time to Give IBM Props: How many tech stocks are up 53% since the dot-com boom?... Read
9 Mar 11 - DBTA - Database Administration and the Goal of Diminishing Downtime... Read
2 Feb 11 - DBTAs - Informix 11.7 Flexible Grid Provides a Different Way of Looking at Database Servers... Read
27 Jan 11 - exactsolutions - Exact to Add Informix Support to Database Replay, SQL Monitoring Solutions... Read
25 Jan 11 - PR Newswire - Bank of China in the UK Works With IBM to Become a Smarter, Greener Bank... Read
12 Oct 10 - Database Trends and Applications - Informix 11.7: The Beginning of the Next Decade of IBM Informix... Read
20 Sep 10 - planetIDS.com - ITG analyst paper: Cost/Benefit case for IBM Informix as compared to Microsoft SQL Server... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - IBM Informix Choice Edition V11.50 helps deploy low-cost scalable and reliable solutions for Apple Macintosh and Microsoft Windows... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - Software withdrawal: Elite Support for Informix Ultimate-C Edition... Read
24 May 10 - eWeek Europe - IBM Supplies Database Tech For EU Smart Grid... Read
23 May 10 - SiliconIndia - IBM's smart metering system allows wise use of energy... Read
21 May 10 - CNET - IBM to help people monitor energy use... Read
20 May 10 - ebiz - IBM Teams With Hildebrand To Bring Smart Metering To Homes Across Britain... Read
19 May 10 - The New Blog Times - Misurare il consumo energetico: DEHEMS è pronto... Read
19 May 10 - ZDNet - IBM software in your home? Pact enables five-city smart meter pilot in Europe... Read
17 March 10 - ZDNet (blog) David Morgenstern - TCO: New research finds Macs in the enterprise easier, cheaper to manage than... Read
17 March 2010 - Virtualization Review - ...key components of Big Blue's platform to the commercial cloud such as its WebSphere suite of application ser vers and its DB2 and Informix databases... Read
10 February 2010 - The Wall Street Journal - International Business Machines is expanding an initiative to win over students and professors on its products. How do they lure the college crowd?... Read


End of Support Dates

IIUG on Facebook IIUG on Twitter

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum

Re: Cost of ALTER table

Posted By: Art Kagel
Date: Friday, 8 November 2013, at 2:52 p.m.

In Response To: Re: Cost of ALTER table (FRANK)

oooo oooo

o o o o

oooo ( oooo

(_

\__________/

Art S. Kagel, Principal Consultant

Advanced DataTools (www.advancedatatools.com)
Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/

Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own opinions
and do not reflect on my employer, Advanced DataTools, the IIUG, nor any
other organization with which I am associated either explicitly,
implicitly, or by inference. Neither do those opinions reflect those of
other individuals affiliated with any entity with which I am affiliated nor
those of the entities themselves.

On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:27 AM, FRANK <yunyaoqu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes. Fully agree that lot of good or better options are out there for
> database design from both resource saving or performance point of view...
> to make database run fast and healthy from a long run! Unfortunately,
> many things are out of our control( for example, the Boss designed it
> and like that.... )
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Art Kagel <art.kagel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Personally, as a database architect, I prefer to use a child table of
> > smaller CHAR columns of length 60 to 80 bytes with the parent's primary
> key
> > and an ordinal sequence number for unlimited text columns instead of a
> > VARCHAR or LVARCHAR in the parent. That way you ONLY save what you need
> to
> > save, you waste less disk, the insert and select performance is better,
> and
> > you present your applications with virtually unlimited text entry. If you
> > make the sequence column a SMALLINT you can get 32765 rows of say 80
> > characters. If that's not enough, then use an int to allow up to over 2
> > billion rows. If your users really want to be able to enter text into the
> > comments field on your forms for years at a time without stopping, make
> it
> > a BIGINT and allow 2^64 characters. At 100 words per minute it would take
> > a VERY fast typist several thousand years to fill the column's capacity.
> > ;-)
> >
> > But seriously, this is best. If your programmers are truly that brain
> dead
> > that they cannot merge the strings together, then give them a stored
> > procedure to do it that returns the concatenated string in an
> > LVARCHAR(32000) and wrap the table in a VIEW that makes the call to the
> > procedure to return the reunified comments "column"! Voila!
> >
> > Art
> >
> > Art S. Kagel, Principal Consultant
> >
> > Advanced DataTools (www.advancedatatools.com)
> > Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
> >
> > Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own opinions
> > and do not reflect on my employer, Advanced DataTools, the IIUG, nor any
> > other organization with which I am associated either explicitly,
> > implicitly, or by inference. Neither do those opinions reflect those of
> > other individuals affiliated with any entity with which I am affiliated
> nor
> > those of the entities themselves.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Fernando Nunes <domusonline@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > The only time I tried to measure, VARCHARs were much slower on
> INSERTs...
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Everett Mills <
> > > Everett.Mills@nationalbeef.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > That's true if you aren't updating those fields. Update a CHAR to any
> > > value
> > > > that fits the field length, no problem. Update a VARCHAR to something
> > > > bigger,
> > > > then you have a few hoops to jump through.
> > > >
> > > > --EEM
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: ids-bounces@iiug.org [mailto:ids-bounces@iiug.org] On Behalf
> > Of
> > > > > FRANK
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 6:34 PM
> > > > > To: ids@iiug.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: Cost of ALTER table [31892]
> > > > >
> > > > > As the lengths of values of the column will vary sharply ( from 32
> > > > > characters to 128 characters), varchar(128) is expected to get both
> > > > > disk space saving and performance gaining, agree?
> > > > >
> > > > > We had past experience : that varchar(256) outperformed a lot
> > > > > char(256) when the table has hundreds of millions of rows and
> > majority
> > > > > of its value lengths are much shorter ( less than 50 characters)!
> Do
> > > > > you have similar experience ? By the way, our application rarely
> > update
> > > > > the rows after they are initially inserted.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Frank
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Habichtsberg, Reinhard <
> > > > > RHabichtsberg@arz-emmendingen.de> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The slow alters are a general problem, resp. with varchar,
> lvarchar
> > > > > > and boolean. If there are lvarchar or boolean columns in your
> table
> > > > > > even each alter will be a slow alter!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > One have to be aware of the expected amout of rows and size of a
> > > > > table
> > > > > > when determining the column types. With big tables I would avoid
> to
> > > > > > use those types which sqeeze you to slow alter, particular if you
> > > > > have
> > > > > > to alter tables frequently. That is, for example, the case in my
> > > > > > company because most of our software which uses informix is
> > > > > > self-developed. With one or two dba's we have to serve 30
> > developers.
> > > > > > Because we are underlying frequent software changes due to comply
> > > > > with
> > > > > > changing legal requirements the need to alter even very big
> tables
> > of
> > > > > > 100 of millions or billions of rows appears rather often. And we
> > > > > > cannot afford long downtimes. We are running 7 x 24 h.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, we have a critical glance to all "create and alter tables"
> > > > > > statements.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In your case I would challenge the need of varchar. Probably I
> > would
> > > > > > refuse the alter to varchar and would suggest to alter to
> > char(128).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And if anyone reads this who is able to place a feature request:
> > > > > > Please make inplace alter possible for changes on varchar and
> > tables
> > > > > > which hold columns of type lvarchar and boolean.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kind regards
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Reinhard Habichtsberg
> > > > > > Dienstleistungsverantwortlicher IT-Rechenzentrum Bereich Server-,
> > > > > > Speicher- und Datenbanksysteme
> > > > > > B-203
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: ids-bounces@iiug.org [mailto:ids-bounces@iiug.org] On
> > Behalf
> > > > > > > Of
> > > > > > FRANK
> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 12:37 AM
> > > > > > > To: ids@iiug.org
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Cost of ALTER table [31886]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks Fernando and Keith!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The original table schema is the following.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It is modifying from check_sum char(32) to check_sum
> > varchar(128).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for the info of double space size needed for this job!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think we will mark it unavailable and do a online ALTER for
> the
> > > > > job.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Frank
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > create table "informix".ds_archive01 (
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > dataset_name varchar(255,44) not null ,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > archive_site char(10) not null ,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > path_name varchar(250,50),
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > archive_dt datetime year to second,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > update_dt datetime year to second,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > hsm_fs char(10),
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > check_sum char(32),
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > tape_name char(16),
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > tape_block integer,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > tape_offset integer,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > checksum_dt datetime year to second
> > > > > > > ) in dbdw04 extent size 4096 next size 4096 lock mode row;
> revoke
> > > > > > > all
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > "informix".ds_archive01 from "public" as "informix";
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > create index "informix".ds_arch01_idx1 on
> "informix".ds_archive01
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (archive_dt) using btree in dbdw04; create index
> > > > > > > "informix".ds_arch01_idx2 on "informix".ds_archive01
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (tape_name) using btree in dbdw04;
> > > > > > > create unique index "informix".ds_arch01_ipk on
> > > > > > "informix".ds_archive01
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (dataset_name) using btree in dbdw05; alter table
> > > > > > > "informix".ds_archive01 add constraint primary key
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (dataset_name) constraint "informix".ds_arch01_pk ;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Fernando Nunes
> > > > > > > <domusonline@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/idshelp/v115/topic/com.ibm.perf.doc/
> > > > > > id
> > > > > > s_prf_335.
> > > > > > > htm
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Without the whole table schema the answer may not be 100%
> > > > > > > > accurate, but it looks like you're on the last situation
> > > > > described
> > > > > > > > in the URL
> > > > > > above:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "Modifying the original size or reserve specifications of
> > VARCHAR
> > > > > > > > or NVARCHAR columns."
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As the name implies, it will be "slow" and will consume at
> > least
> > > > > > > > the double of the table size. The alternatives don't look
> good,
> > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > that's
> > > > > > > > the reason why "in-place alters" were created. The options I
> > see:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1- UNLOAD the table, drop/create it and load. This will save
> > > > > space
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > with external tables can be fast. Of course it means data
> > > > > > unavailability.
> > > > > > > > 2- Create a side table type raw, with the new schema. Copy
> the
> > > > > data.
> > > > > > > > Will not save space, but depending on the data use it may
> help
> > > > > > > > with availability (if the table has historic data that
> doesn't
> > > > > > > > change you can do most of the work "online" and then stop
> > access
> > > > > > > > for the
> > > > > > "recent"
> > > > > > > > data
> > > > > > > > 3- Other weird options like create a new table, rename the
> > > > > > > > existing one, create a view with union between both tables
> and
> > > > > > > > move the data "online", maybe with the usage of triggers to
> > > > > > > > capture changes of
> > > > > > data
> > > > > > > > already copied.... Will not save space, but can give you the
> > most
> > > > > > > > availability (and
> > > > > > > > work....)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 9:40 PM, FRANK <yunyaoqu@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi, All,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > IDS11.50 FC8, Redhat Linux 5.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Seems the following types of ALTER to enlarge a column
> width
> > of
> > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > BIG tables(100 millions of rows),
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ALTER TABLE ds_archive01 MODIFY check_sum varchar(128);
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > can incur excessive amount of disk consumption !!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Any comments or suggestions?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Frank
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --089e0163535606074a04ea88ff3f
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > **********************************************************************
> > > > > > **
> > > > > > *******
> > > > > > > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the
> discussion
> > > > > > forum.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Fernando Nunes
> > > > > > > > Portugal
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > http://informix-technology.blogspot.com
> > > > > > > > My email works... but I don't check it frequently...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --bcaec51d255275373b04ea898271
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > **********************************************************************
> > > > > > **
> > > > > > *******
> > > > > > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion
> > > > > forum.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --047d7b62226c17778304ea8a9fdf
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > **********************************************************************
> > > > > > **
> > > > > > *******
> > > > > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion
> > forum.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > ***********************************************************************
> > > > > ********
> > > > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion
> forum.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --047d7b66f285ca7bfc04ea9f8a0a
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ***********************************************************************
> > > > > ********
> > > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> *******************************************************************************
> > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Fernando Nunes
> > > Portugal
> > >
> > > http://informix-technology.blogspot.com
> > > My email works... but I don't check it frequently...
> > >
> > > --047d7bdc192cdcdb9604eaabb41c
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> *******************************************************************************
> > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --047d7b343ef260514504eaad66bc
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> *******************************************************************************
> > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> >
> >
>
> --001a11c3a1bc68786c04eaaf6077
>
>
>
> *******************************************************************************
> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>
>

--047d7b34337cc961c704eaafb87c

Messages In This Thread

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 5.12.