Join IIUG
 for   
 

Informix News
18 Nov 13 - ZDNet - Top 20 mobile skills in demand... Read
09 Sep 13 - telecompaper - Shaspa and Tatung have shown a new smart home platform at Ifa in Berlin. Powered by the IBM Informix software... Read
06 Sep 13 - IBM data magazine - Mission Accomplished - Miami, Florida will be the backdrop for the 2014 IIUG Informix Conference... Read
01 Feb 13 - IBM Data Magazine - Are your database backups safe? Lester Knutsen (IBM Champion) writes about database back up safety using "archecker"... Read
14 Nov 12 - IBM - IBM's Big Data For Smart Grid Goes Live In Texas... Read
3 Oct 12 - The Financial - IBM and TransWorks Collaborate to Help Louisiana-Pacific Corporation Achieve Supply Chain Efficiency... Read
28 Aug 12 - techCLOUD9 - Splunk kicks up a SaaS Storm... Read
10 Aug 12 - businessCLOUD9 - Is this the other half of Cloud monitoring?... Read
3 Aug 12 - IBM data management - Supercharging the data warehouse while keeping costs down IBM Informix Warehouse Accelerator (IWA) delivers superior performance for in-memory analytics processing... Read
2 Aug 12 - channelbiz - Oninit Group launches Pay Per Pulse cloud-based service... Read
28 May 12 - Bloor - David Norfolk on the recent Informix benchmark "pretty impressive results"... Read
23 May 12 - DBTA - Informix Genero: A Way to Modernize Informix 4GL Applications... Read
9 Apr 12 - Mastering Data Management - Upping the Informix Ante: Advanced Data Tools... Read
22 Mar 12 - developerWorks - Optimizing Informix database access... Read
14 Mar 12 - BernieSpang.com - International Informix User Group set to meet in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - IIUG Heads West for 2012 - Get ready for sun and sand in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - Running Informix on Solid-State Drives.Speed Up Database Access... Read
26 Feb 12 - BernieSpan.com - Better results, lower cost for a broad set of new IBM clients and partners... Read
24 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Informix Warehouse Accelerator: Continuous Acceleration during Data Refresh... Read
6 Feb 12 - PRLOG - Informix port delivers unlimited database scalability for popular SaaS application ... Read
2 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Loading data with the IBM Informix TimeSeries Plug-in for Data Studio... Read
1 Feb 12 - developerWorks - 100 Tech Tips, #47: Log-in to Fix Central... Read
13 Jan 12 - MC Press online - Informix Dynamic Server Entices New Users with Free Production Edition ... Read
11 Jan 12 - Computerworld - Ecologic Analytics and Landis+Gyr -- Suitors Decide to Tie the Knot... Read
9 Jan 12 - planetIDS.com - DNS impact on Informix / Impacto do DNS no Informix... Read
8 Sep 11 - TMCnet.com - IBM Offers Database Solution to Enable Smart Meter Data Capture... Read
1 Aug 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Happy 10th anniversary to IBM and Informix... Read
8 Jul 11 - Database Trends and Applications - Managing Time Series Data with Informix... Read
31 May 11 - Smart Grid - The meter data management pitfall utilities are overlooking... Read
27 May 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Big data, big time ( Series data, warehouse acceleration, and 4GLs )... Read
16 May 11 - Business Wire - HiT Software Announces DBMoto for Enterprise Integration, Adds Informix. Log-based Change Data Capture... Read
21 Mar 11 - Yahoo! Finance - IBM and Cable&Wireless Worldwide Announce UK Smart Energy Cloud... Read
14 Mar 11 - MarketWatch - Fuzzy Logix and IBM Unveil In-Database Analytics for IBM Informix... Read
11 Mar 11 - InvestorPlace - It's Time to Give IBM Props: How many tech stocks are up 53% since the dot-com boom?... Read
9 Mar 11 - DBTA - Database Administration and the Goal of Diminishing Downtime... Read
2 Feb 11 - DBTAs - Informix 11.7 Flexible Grid Provides a Different Way of Looking at Database Servers... Read
27 Jan 11 - exactsolutions - Exact to Add Informix Support to Database Replay, SQL Monitoring Solutions... Read
25 Jan 11 - PR Newswire - Bank of China in the UK Works With IBM to Become a Smarter, Greener Bank... Read
12 Oct 10 - Database Trends and Applications - Informix 11.7: The Beginning of the Next Decade of IBM Informix... Read
20 Sep 10 - planetIDS.com - ITG analyst paper: Cost/Benefit case for IBM Informix as compared to Microsoft SQL Server... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - IBM Informix Choice Edition V11.50 helps deploy low-cost scalable and reliable solutions for Apple Macintosh and Microsoft Windows... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - Software withdrawal: Elite Support for Informix Ultimate-C Edition... Read
24 May 10 - eWeek Europe - IBM Supplies Database Tech For EU Smart Grid... Read
23 May 10 - SiliconIndia - IBM's smart metering system allows wise use of energy... Read
21 May 10 - CNET - IBM to help people monitor energy use... Read
20 May 10 - ebiz - IBM Teams With Hildebrand To Bring Smart Metering To Homes Across Britain... Read
19 May 10 - The New Blog Times - Misurare il consumo energetico: DEHEMS è pronto... Read
19 May 10 - ZDNet - IBM software in your home? Pact enables five-city smart meter pilot in Europe... Read
17 March 10 - ZDNet (blog) David Morgenstern - TCO: New research finds Macs in the enterprise easier, cheaper to manage than... Read
17 March 2010 - Virtualization Review - ...key components of Big Blue's platform to the commercial cloud such as its WebSphere suite of application ser vers and its DB2 and Informix databases... Read
10 February 2010 - The Wall Street Journal - International Business Machines is expanding an initiative to win over students and professors on its products. How do they lure the college crowd?... Read


End of Support Dates

IIUG on Facebook IIUG on Twitter

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum

RE: Problems with restore on Windows

Posted By: Schleicher, Keith
Date: Thursday, 21 February 2013, at 11:21 a.m.

In Response To: RE: Problems with restore on Windows (Andrew Grantham)

Andrew,

Thank you for responding. All of the links are correct, and the backup was taken on this version with this server. It is a level 0 backup.

We are looking at restoring the actual files from a backup, but we aren't sure that those files themselves were backed up.

Does the fact that I got an error trying to do an "ontape -r" and getting an error message that the tape was bad mean that I can't restore this entire instance using this file?

________________________________________
From: ids-bounces@iiug.org [ids-bounces@iiug.org] on behalf of Andrew Grantham [agrantha@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 10:03 AM
To: ids@iiug.org
Subject: RE: Problems with restore on Windows [29559]

Keith,

If it helps another dbspace ( and its chunks ) are marked as down ( ddrrflsdbs
). Sorry for coming into this late but I guess all links are correct? The
backup you are using was taken on this version of Informix? If this a level 0
restoration using ontape?

> To: ids@iiug.org
> From: Keith.Schleicher@searshc.com
> Subject: RE: Problems with restore on Windows [29558]
> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:55:06 -0500
>
> I tried to start up the database instance, but now it is in Fast Recovery
> mode. However, when I run "onstat -d update" I get the following:
>
> d:\IDS9~1.40>onstat -d update
> Informix Dynamic Server Version 9.40.TC1 -- Fast Recovery -- Up 06:57:53 --
> 849024 Kbytes
> Dbspaces
> address number flags fchunk nchunks flags owner name
> 3EC8B7D8 1 0x1 1 3 N informix rootdbs
> 3F444EC8 2 0x1 19 1 N informix plogdbs
> 3F445EC8 4 0x1 4 1 N informix llogdbs01
> 3F446308 5 0x40001 12 11 N B informix ddrrdbs
> 3F446458 6 0x2001 6 4 N T informix tempdbs01
> 3F4465A8 7 0x2001 7 4 N T informix tempdbs02
> 3F4466F8 8 0x40005 13 7 ND B informix ddrrflsdbs
> 7 active, 2047 maximum
> Chunks
> address chunk/dbs offset size free bpages flags pathname
> 3EC8B928 1 1 0 12800 11076 PO-- D:\IFMXDATA\ifmx00253\rootdbs_dat.000
> 3F443318 2 6 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs01_02
> 3F443490 3 7 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs02_02
> 3F443608 4 4 0 51200 44647 PO-- d:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\llogdbs01
> 3F443780 5 8 0 2048000 0 PD-B e:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_02
> 3F4438F8 6 6 0 512000 511947 PO-- d:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs01
> 3F443A70 7 7 0 512000 511947 PO-- d:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs02
> 3F443BE8 8 8 0 2048000 0 PD-B e:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_03
> 3F443D60 9 8 0 2048000 0 PD-B e:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_04
> 3F444018 10 8 0 1024000 0 PD-B e:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_05
> 3F444190 11 8 0 2023000 0 PD-B e:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_06
> 3F444308 12 5 0 1536000 36 PO-B e:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_01
> 3F444480 13 8 0 4096000 0 PD-B e:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_01
> 3F4445F8 14 8 0 2048000 0 PD-B e:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_07
> 3F444770 15 5 0 512000 6 PO-B e:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_02
> 3F4448E8 16 5 0 512000 1 PO-B e:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_03
> 3F444A60 17 5 0 512000 1 PO-B e:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_04
> 3F444BD8 18 5 0 512000 3 PO-B e:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_05
> 3F444D50 19 2 0 64025 1472 PO-- d:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\plogdbs01
> 3F445018 20 5 0 256000 3 PO-B d:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_06
> 3F445190 21 6 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs01_03
> 3F445308 22 7 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs02_03
> 3F445480 23 5 0 256000 5 PO-B d:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_07
> 3F4455F8 24 5 0 256000 0 PO-B d:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_08
> 3F445770 25 5 0 256000 7 PO-B d:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_09
> 3F4458E8 26 5 0 512000 6 PO-B d:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_10
> 3F445A60 27 1 0 12800 12797 PO-- d:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\rootdbs_dat.001
> 3F445BD8 28 1 0 250000 249997 PO-- D:\IFMXDATA\ifmx00253\rootdbs_dat.002
> 3F445D50 29 6 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs01_04
> 3F446018 30 7 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs02_04
> 3F446190 31 5 0 256000 166960 PO-B d:\ifmxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_11
>
> It looks like all of the chunks associated with the ddrrdbs dbspace are
coming
> up as online, including the two that were marked as down, and the ddrrflsdbs
> dbspace has all of its chunks marked as full. The error log file is getting
a
> bunch of these messages:
>
> 08:52:06 Log Record: log = 15368, pos = 0x1edc70, type =
OLDRSAM:DELITEM(29),
> trans = 55
> 08:52:06 Rollforward of log record failed. iserrno = 101
> 08:52:06 Log Record: log = 15368, pos = 0x1ecca4, type =
OLDRSAM:DELITEM(29),
> trans = 55
> 08:52:06 Rollforward of log record failed. iserrno = 101
> 08:52:06 Log Record: log = 15368, pos = 0x1ecca4, type =
OLDRSAM:DELITEM(29),
> trans = 55
> 08:52:07 Rollforward of log record failed. iserrno = 135
> 08:52:07 Log Record: log = 15368, pos = 0x1ed1dc, type =
OLDRSAM:DELITEM(29),
> trans = 55
> 08:52:07 Rollforward of log record failed. iserrno = 135
> 08:52:07 Log Record: log = 15368, pos = 0x1ed1dc, type =
OLDRSAM:DELITEM(29),
> trans = 55
> 08:52:07 Rollforward of log record failed. iserrno = 135
> 08:52:07 Log Record: log = 15368, pos = 0x1ebe5c, type =
OLDRSAM:DELITEM(29),
> trans = 55
> 08:52:07 Rollforward of log record failed. iserrno = 135
> 08:52:07 Log Record: log = 15368, pos = 0x1ebe5c, type =
OLDRSAM:DELITEM(29),
> trans = 55
>
> I am guessing I will need to try to restore the ddrrflsdbs dbspace. Does
> anyone else have any other suggestions? The Fast Recovery has been going on
> for about seven hours now, and I'd like to be able to get this server
running
> in a usable state.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: ids-bounces@iiug.org [ids-bounces@iiug.org] on behalf of Schleicher,
> Keith [Keith.Schleicher@searshc.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:18 PM
> To: ids@iiug.org
> Subject: Problems with restore on Windows [29544]
>
> We have a Win 2000 SP4 running Informix 9.40.TC1. We recently had an issue=
> where some chunks went bad:
>
> Informix Dynamic Server Version 9.40.TC1 -- On-Line -- Up 00:39:45 -- 8=
> 67072 Kbytes
>
> Dbspaces
> address number flags fchunk nchunks flags owner name
> 3EC8B7D8 1 0x1 1 3 N informix rootdbs
> 3F446EC8 2 0x1 19 1 N informix plogdbs
> 3F447EC8 4 0x1 4 1 N informix llogdbs01
> 3F448308 5 0x40001 12 11 N B informix ddrrdbs
> 3F448458 6 0x2001 6 4 N T informix tempdbs01
> 3F4485A8 7 0x2001 7 4 N T informix tempdbs02
> 3F4486F8 8 0x40001 13 7 N B informix ddrrflsdbs
> 7 active, 2047 maximum
>
> Chunks
> address chunk/dbs offset size free bpages flags pathn=
> ame
> 3EC8B928 1 1 0 12800 11076 PO-- D:\IF=
> MXDATA\ifmx00253\rootdbs_dat.000
> 3F445318 2 6 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs01_02
> 3F445490 3 7 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs02_02
> 3F445608 4 4 0 51200 44647 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\llogdbs01
> 3F445780 5 8 0 2048000 10747 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_02
> 3F4458F8 6 6 0 512000 511497 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs01
> 3F445A70 7 7 0 512000 511497 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs02
> 3F445BE8 8 8 0 2048000 1128 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_03
> 3F445D60 9 8 0 2048000 1670 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_04
> 3F446018 10 8 0 1024000 6229 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_05
> 3F446190 11 8 0 2023000 171011 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_06
> 3F446308 12 5 0 1536000 36 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_01
> 3F446480 13 8 0 4096000 53393 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_01
> 3F4465F8 14 8 0 2048000 1164797 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_07
> 3F446770 15 5 0 512000 6 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_02
> 3F4468E8 16 5 0 512000 1 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_03
> 3F446A60 17 5 0 512000 1 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_04
> 3F446BD8 18 5 0 512000 3 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_05
> 3F446D50 19 2 0 64025 1472 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\plogdbs01
> 3F447018 20 5 0 256000 0 PD-B d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_06
> 3F447190 21 6 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs01_03
> 3F447308 22 7 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs02_03
> 3F447480 23 5 0 256000 0 PD-B d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_07
> 3F4475F8 24 5 0 256000 0 PO-B d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_08
> 3F447770 25 5 0 256000 7 PO-B d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_09
> 3F4478E8 26 5 0 512000 6 PO-B d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_10
> 3F447A60 27 1 0 12800 12797 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\rootdbs_dat.001
> 3F447BD8 28 1 0 250000 249997 PO-- D:\IF=
> MXDATA\ifmx00253\rootdbs_dat.002
> 3F447D50 29 6 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs01_04
> 3F448018 30 7 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs02_04
> 3F448190 31 5 0 256000 166960 PO-B d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_11
> 31 active, 32766 maximum
>
> I tried to just restore the ddrrfls dbspace. After that happened more chun=
> ks came back as down:
>
> Informix Dynamic Server Version 9.40.TC1 -- On-Line -- Up 02:26:50 -- 8=
> 67072 Kbytes
>
> Dbspaces
> address number flags fchunk nchunks flags owner name
> 3EC8B7D8 1 0x1 1 3 N informix rootdbs
> 3F446EC8 2 0x1 19 1 N informix plogdbs
> 3F447EC8 4 0x1 4 1 N informix llogdbs01
> 3F448308 5 0x40005 12 11 ND B informix ddrrdbs
> 3F448458 6 0x2001 6 4 N T informix tempdbs01
> 3F4485A8 7 0x2001 7 4 N T informix tempdbs02
> 3F4486F8 8 0x40001 13 7 N B informix ddrrflsdbs
> 7 active, 2047 maximum
>
> Chunks
> address chunk/dbs offset size free bpages flags pathn=
> ame
> 3EC8B928 1 1 0 12800 11076 PO-- D:\IF=
> MXDATA\ifmx00253\rootdbs_dat.000
> 3F445318 2 6 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs01_02
> 3F445490 3 7 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs02_02
> 3F445608 4 4 0 51200 44647 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\llogdbs01
> 3F445780 5 8 0 2048000 10747 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_02
> 3F4458F8 6 6 0 512000 508757 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs01
> 3F445A70 7 7 0 512000 508813 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs02
> 3F445BE8 8 8 0 2048000 1128 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_03
> 3F445D60 9 8 0 2048000 1670 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_04
> 3F446018 10 8 0 1024000 6229 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_05
> 3F446190 11 8 0 2023000 171011 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_06
> 3F446308 12 5 0 1536000 0 PD-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_01
> 3F446480 13 8 0 4096000 52937 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_01
> 3F4465F8 14 8 0 2048000 1164797 PO-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrrfls_07
> 3F446770 15 5 0 512000 0 PD-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_02
> 3F4468E8 16 5 0 512000 0 PD-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_03
> 3F446A60 17 5 0 512000 0 PD-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_04
> 3F446BD8 18 5 0 512000 0 PD-B e:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_05
> 3F446D50 19 2 0 64025 1472 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\plogdbs01
> 3F447018 20 5 0 256000 0 PD-B d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_06
> 3F447190 21 6 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs01_03
> 3F447308 22 7 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs02_03
> 3F447480 23 5 0 256000 0 PD-B d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_07
> 3F4475F8 24 5 0 256000 0 PD-B d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_08
> 3F447770 25 5 0 256000 0 PD-B d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_09
> 3F4478E8 26 5 0 512000 0 PD-B d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_10
> 3F447A60 27 1 0 12800 12797 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\rootdbs_dat.001
> 3F447BD8 28 1 0 250000 249997 PO-- D:\IF=
> MXDATA\ifmx00253\rootdbs_dat.002
> 3F447D50 29 6 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs01_04
> 3F448018 30 7 0 512000 511997 PO-- d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\tempdbs02_04
> 3F448190 31 5 0 256000 0 PD-B d:\if=
> mxdata\ifmx00253\datadbsddrr_11
> 31 active, 32766 maximum
>
> Expanded chunk capacity mode: enabled
>
> I think tried to restore using an "ontape -r" but I got an error message sa=
> ying that the tape was bad, even though I had just used that same file for =
> the restore of the ddrrfls dbspace.
>
> Any ideas for what to do next? Do I need to get some new files and rename =
> the dbspaces?
>
> We did have the SA do a scan of the drive these files are on and we got no =
> physical errors.
>
> This message, including any attachments, is the property of Sears Holdings =
> Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries. It is confidential and may cont=
> ain proprietary or legally privileged information. If you are not the inten=
> ded recipient, please delete it without reading the contents. Thank you.
>
>
>
*******************************************************************************
> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>
> This message, including any attachments, is the property of Sears Holdings
> Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries. It is confidential and may
contain
> proprietary or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please delete it without reading the contents. Thank you.
>
>
>
*******************************************************************************
> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>

*******************************************************************************
Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.

This message, including any attachments, is the property of Sears Holdings Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries. It is confidential and may contain proprietary or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it without reading the contents. Thank you.

Messages In This Thread

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 5.12.