International Informix Users Group

	Informix News

18 Nov 13 - ZDNet - Top 20 mobile skills in demand... Read 09 Sep 13 - telecompaper - Shaspa and Tatung have shown a new smart home platform at Ifa in Berlin. Powered by the IBM Informix software... Read 06 Sep 13 - IBM data magazine - Mission Accomplished - Miami, Florida will be the backdrop for the 2014 IIUG Informix Conference... Read 01 Feb 13 - IBM Data Magazine - Are your database backups safe? Lester Knutsen (IBM Champion) writes about database back up safety using "archecker"... Read 14 Nov 12 - IBM - IBM's Big Data For Smart Grid Goes Live In Texas... Read 3 Oct 12 - The Financial - IBM and TransWorks Collaborate to Help Louisiana-Pacific Corporation Achieve Supply Chain Efficiency... Read 28 Aug 12 - techCLOUD9 - Splunk kicks up a SaaS Storm... Read 10 Aug 12 - businessCLOUD9 - Is this the other half of Cloud monitoring?... Read 3 Aug 12 - IBM data management - Supercharging the data warehouse while keeping costs down IBM Informix Warehouse Accelerator (IWA) delivers superior performance for in-memory analytics processing... Read 2 Aug 12 - channelbiz - Oninit Group launches Pay Per Pulse cloud-based service... Read 28 May 12 - Bloor - David Norfolk on the recent Informix benchmark "pretty impressive results"... Read 23 May 12 - DBTA - Informix Genero: A Way to Modernize Informix 4GL Applications... Read 9 Apr 12 - Mastering Data Management - Upping the Informix Ante: Advanced Data Tools... Read 22 Mar 12 - developerWorks - Optimizing Informix database access... Read 14 Mar 12 - BernieSpang.com - International Informix User Group set to meet in San Diego... Read 1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - IIUG Heads West for 2012 - Get ready for sun and sand in San Diego... Read 1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - Running Informix on Solid-State Drives.Speed Up Database Access... Read 26 Feb 12 - BernieSpan.com - Better results, lower cost for a broad set of new IBM clients and partners... Read 24 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Informix Warehouse Accelerator: Continuous Acceleration during Data Refresh... Read 6 Feb 12 - PRLOG - Informix port delivers unlimited database scalability for popular SaaS application ... Read 2 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Loading data with the IBM Informix TimeSeries Plug-in for Data Studio... Read 1 Feb 12 - developerWorks - 100 Tech Tips, #47: Log-in to Fix Central... Read 13 Jan 12 - MC Press online - Informix Dynamic Server Entices New Users with Free Production Edition ... Read 11 Jan 12 - Computerworld - Ecologic Analytics and Landis+Gyr -- Suitors Decide to Tie the Knot... Read 9 Jan 12 - planetIDS.com - DNS impact on Informix / Impacto do DNS no Informix... Read 8 Sep 11 - TMCnet.com - IBM Offers Database Solution to Enable Smart Meter Data Capture... Read 1 Aug 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Happy 10th anniversary to IBM and Informix... Read 8 Jul 11 - Database Trends and Applications - Managing Time Series Data with Informix... Read 31 May 11 - Smart Grid - The meter data management pitfall utilities are overlooking... Read 27 May 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Big data, big time ( Series data, warehouse acceleration, and 4GLs )... Read 16 May 11 - Business Wire - HiT Software Announces DBMoto for Enterprise Integration, Adds Informix. Log-based Change Data Capture... Read 21 Mar 11 - Yahoo! Finance - IBM and Cable&Wireless Worldwide Announce UK Smart Energy Cloud... Read 14 Mar 11 - MarketWatch - Fuzzy Logix and IBM Unveil In-Database Analytics for IBM Informix... Read 11 Mar 11 - InvestorPlace - It's Time to Give IBM Props: How many tech stocks are up 53% since the dot-com boom?... Read 9 Mar 11 - DBTA - Database Administration and the Goal of Diminishing Downtime... Read 2 Feb 11 - DBTAs - Informix 11.7 Flexible Grid Provides a Different Way of Looking at Database Servers... Read 27 Jan 11 - exactsolutions - Exact to Add Informix Support to Database Replay, SQL Monitoring Solutions... Read 25 Jan 11 - PR Newswire - Bank of China in the UK Works With IBM to Become a Smarter, Greener Bank... Read 12 Oct 10 - Database Trends and Applications - Informix 11.7: The Beginning of the Next Decade of IBM Informix... Read 20 Sep 10 - planetIDS.com - ITG analyst paper: Cost/Benefit case for IBM Informix as compared to Microsoft SQL Server... Read 20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - IBM Informix Choice Edition V11.50 helps deploy low-cost scalable and reliable solutions for Apple Macintosh and Microsoft Windows... Read 20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - Software withdrawal: Elite Support for Informix Ultimate-C Edition... Read 24 May 10 - eWeek Europe - IBM Supplies Database Tech For EU Smart Grid... Read 23 May 10 - SiliconIndia - IBM's smart metering system allows wise use of energy... Read 21 May 10 - CNET - IBM to help people monitor energy use... Read 20 May 10 - ebiz - IBM Teams With Hildebrand To Bring Smart Metering To Homes Across Britain... Read 19 May 10 - The New Blog Times - Misurare il consumo energetico: DEHEMS è pronto... Read 19 May 10 - ZDNet - IBM software in your home? Pact enables five-city smart meter pilot in Europe... Read 17 March 10 - ZDNet (blog) David Morgenstern - TCO: New research finds Macs in the enterprise easier, cheaper to manage than... Read 17 March 2010 - Virtualization Review - ...key components of Big Blue's platform to the commercial cloud such as its WebSphere suite of application ser vers and its DB2 and Informix databases... Read 10 February 2010 - The Wall Street Journal - International Business Machines is expanding an initiative to win over students and professors on its products. How do they lure the college crowd?... Read Previous news items

End of Support Dates

IDS 11.10 - 30 Sep 2012 Subscribe to notifications

Home Member Area Forums About IIUG Help

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum

RE: ER queue question

Posted By: Habichtsberg, Reinhard
Date: Friday, 4 January 2013, at 5:05 a.m.

In Response To: RE: ER queue question (Habichtsberg, Reinhard)

Solved: The queues of the affected replicates could be cleared by "cdr
stop replicate replicatename" and " cdr start replicate replicatename"
while there was no activity on the corresponding tables.
THX.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ids-bounces@iiug.org [mailto:ids-bounces@iiug.org] On Behalf Of
> Habichtsberg, Reinhard
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 6:35 PM
> To: ids@iiug.org
> Subject: RE: ER queue question [29174]
>
> Hi,
>
> sorry, the picture from OAT is not visible in the posts. Perhaps the
output of
> onstat -g rqm may help:
>
> IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 11.70.FC5 -- On-Line -- Up 160
days
> 06:40:12 -- 1392640 Kbytes
>
> CDR Reliable Queue Manager (RQM) Statistics:
>
> RQM Statistics for Queue (0x13d15b028) trg_send Transaction Spool
Name:
> trg_send_stxn Insert Stamp: 4542401
> Flags: SEND_Q, SPOOLED, PROGRESS_TABLE, NEED_ACK Txns in queue: 3
> Log Events in queue: 0 Txns in memory: 3 Txns in spool only: 0 Txns
spooled: 0
> Unspooled bytes: 3249 Size of Data in queue: 3249 Bytes Real memory in
use:
> 3249 Bytes Pending Txn Buffers: 0 Pending Txn Data: 0 Bytes Max Real
memory
> data used: 16543776 (104857600) Bytes Max Real memory hdrs used
7939920
> (2276352000) Bytes Total data queued: 6267081049 Bytes Total Txns
queued:
> 4542401 Total Txns spooled: 149 Total Txns restored: 0 Total Txns
recovered: 0
> Spool Rows read: 0 Total Txns deleted: 4542398 Total Txns duplicated:
0 Total
> Txn Lookups: 13576147
>
> Progress Table:
>
> Progress Table is Stable
>
> On-disk table name............: spttrg_send
>
> Flush interval (time).........: 30
>
> Time of last flush............: 1357234083
>
> Flush interval (serial number): 1000
>
> Serial number of last flush...: 20932
>
> Current serial number.........: 20934
>
> Server Group Bytes Queued Acked Sent
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
>
> 91 0x5a002f 0 90/2565/0x2ac7558/0x0 -
> 90/2565/0x2ac7558/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a0030 0 90/2507/0x175330/0x0 -
> 90/2507/0x175330/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a000e 0 90/2477/0x98a390/0x0 -
> 90/2477/0x98a390/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a0017 0 90/2434/0x45b7198/0x0 -
> 90/2434/0x45b7198/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a0016 0 90/2558/0x46e128/0x0 -
> 90/2558/0x46e128/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a0011 0 90/2565/0x294b110/0x0 -
> 90/2565/0x294b110/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a0012 0 90/2472/0x1b55474/0x0 -
> 90/2472/0x1b55474/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a0015 0 90/2472/0x1ce97b0/0x0 -
> 90/2472/0x1ce97b0/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a0002 0 90/2478/0xad480/0x0 -
> 90/2478/0xad480/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a0010 0 90/2572/0x20ca794/0x0 -
> 90/2572/0x20ca794/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a0008 122494 90/2565/0x2400680/0x0 - 90/2565/0x2400680/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a0009 781954 90/2565/0x25697a8/0x0 - 90/2565/0x25697a8/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a000b 628625 90/2565/0x2802700/0x0 - 90/2565/0x2802700/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a000a 209272 90/2565/0x2681100/0x0 - 90/2565/0x2681100/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a0003 0 90/2565/0x2850268/0x0 -
> 90/2565/0x2850268/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a0007 0 90/2565/0x234e698/0x0 -
> 90/2565/0x234e698/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a0006 0 90/2565/0x22bb2ec/0x0 -
> 90/2565/0x22bb2ec/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a0005 33321020 90/2565/0x222c5c4/0x0 - 90/2565/0x222c5c4/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a001c 0 90/1119/0x720f0/0x0 -
> No Content Yet
>
> 91 0x5a000c 0 90/2565/0x29cc43c/0x0 -
> 90/2565/0x29cc43c/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a001a 0 90/2565/0x295a170/0x0 -
> 90/2565/0x295a170/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a0014 0 90/2565/0x2a36248/0x0 -
> 90/2565/0x2a36248/0x0
>
> 91 0x5a000f 3057 90/2572/0x20df0ec/0x0 - 90/2572/0x20ec0ec/0x0
>
> 91 0x8018 0 90/678/0x3963e4/0x0 -
> No Content Yet
>
> First Txn (0x14021b028) Key: 90/2572/0x020e60ec/0x00000000 Txn Stamp:
> 4542399, Reference Count: 0.
> Txn Flags: Notify
> Txn Commit Time: (1357234101) 2013/01/03 18:28:21 Txn Size in Queue:
1083
> First Buf's (0x13d0f6178) Queue Flags: Resident First Buf's Buffer
Flags: TRG,
> Stream, More
> NeedAck: Waiting for Acks from <[0004]> No open handles on txn.
>
> Last Txn (0x13f7767d8) Key: 90/2572/0x020ec0ec/0x00000000 Txn Stamp:
> 4542401, Reference Count: 0.
> Txn Flags: Notify
> Txn Commit Time: (1357234102) 2013/01/03 18:28:22 Txn Size in Queue:
1083
> First Buf's (0x13f776a80) Queue Flags: Resident First Buf's Buffer
Flags: TRG,
> Stream, More
> NeedAck: Waiting for Acks from <[0004]> Traverse handle (0x13d738028)
for
> thread CDRNsA91 at txn (0x13f7767d8) End_of_Q, Flags: None
>
> Traverse handle (0x13d738028) for thread CDRNsA91 at txn (0x13f7767d8)
> End_of_Q, Flags: None Traverse handle (0x13f5f2028) for thread
CDRNrA91 at
> Head_of_Q, Flags:
> None
> Traverse handle (0x13e1ee028) for thread CDRGeval3 at Head_of_Q,
> Flags: None
> Traverse handle (0x14021b1f0) for thread CDRGeval2 at Head_of_Q,
> Flags: None
> Traverse handle (0x14021c298) for thread CDRGeval0 at Head_of_Q,
> Flags: None
> Traverse handle (0x13d0f61f0) for thread CDRGeval1 at Head_of_Q,
> Flags: None
> Traverse handle (0x13f776ca8) for thread CDRACK_1 at Head_of_Q, Flags:
> None
> Traverse handle (0x13f777d50) for thread CDRACK_0 at Head_of_Q, Flags:
> None
>
> CDR Reliable Queue Manager (RQM) Statistics:
>
> RQM Statistics for Queue (0x13cc09028) control_send Transaction Spool
Name:
> control_send_stxn Insert Stamp: 2851858284585
> Flags: CTRL_SEND_Q, STABLE, USERTXN, PROGRESS_TABLE, NEED_ACK
> Txns in queue: 0 Txns in memory: 0 Txns in spool only: 0 Txns spooled:
0
> Unspooled bytes: 0 Size of Data in queue: 0 Bytes Real memory in use:
0 Bytes
> Pending Txn Buffers: 0 Pending Txn Data: 0 Bytes Max Real memory data
used:
> 5697 (0) Bytes Max Real memory hdrs used 768 (0) Bytes Total data
queued:
> 65161 Bytes Total Txns queued: 42 Total Txns spooled: 42 Total Txns
restored: 0
> Total Txns recovered: 0 Spool Rows read: 0 Total Txns deleted: 42
Total Txns
> duplicated: 0 Total Txn Lookups: 131
>
> Progress Table:
>
> Progress Table is Stable
>
> On-disk table name............: sptcontrol_send
>
> Flush interval (time).........: 30
>
> Time of last flush............: 1356080077
>
> Flush interval (serial number): 1000
>
> Serial number of last flush...: 19
>
> Current serial number.........: 20
>
> Server Group Bytes Queued Acked Sent
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
>
> 91 0x5b0000 0 90/0/0x14d/0x0 -
> 90/0/0x14d/0x0
>
> Traverse handle (0x13ea4d028) for thread CDRNsA91 at Head_of_Q, Flags:
> None
> Traverse handle (0x13f77b028) for thread CDRACK_0 at Head_of_Q, Flags:
> None
> Traverse handle (0x13f775028) for thread CDRACK_1 at Head_of_Q, Flags:
> None
>
> CDR Reliable Queue Manager (RQM) Statistics:
>
> RQM Statistics for Queue (0x13cbdf028) ack_send Insert Stamp: 66
> Flags: ACKSEND_Q
> Txns in queue: 0
> Txns in memory: 0
> Txns in spool only: 0
> Txns spooled: 0
> Unspooled bytes: 0
> Size of Data in queue: 0 Bytes
> Real memory in use: 0 Bytes
> Pending Txn Buffers: 0
> Pending Txn Data: 0 Bytes
> Max Real memory data used: 36 (0) Bytes Max Real memory hdrs used 384
(0)
> Bytes Total data queued: 2304 Bytes Total Txns queued: 66 Total Txns
spooled:
> 0 Total Txns restored: 0 Total Txns recovered: 0 Spool Rows read: 0
Total Txns
> deleted: 66 Total Txns duplicated: 0 Total Txn Lookups: 133
>
> Progress Table: Not configured.
>
> Traverse handle (0x13d736028) for thread CDRNsA91 at Head_of_Q, Flags:
> None
>
> CDR Reliable Queue Manager (RQM) Statistics:
>
> RQM Statistics for Queue (0x13ea2f028) sync_send Insert Stamp: 0
> Flags: SYNC_Q, NEED_ACK
> Txns in queue: 0
> Txns in memory: 0
> Txns in spool only: 0
> Txns spooled: 0
> Unspooled bytes: 0
> Size of Data in queue: 0 Bytes
> Real memory in use: 0 Bytes
> Pending Txn Buffers: 0
> Pending Txn Data: 0 Bytes
> Max Real memory data used: 0 (0) Bytes
> Max Real memory hdrs used 0 (0) Bytes
> Total data queued: 0 Bytes
> Total Txns queued: 0
> Total Txns spooled: 0
> Total Txns restored: 0
> Total Txns recovered: 0
> Spool Rows read: 0
> Total Txns deleted: 0
> Total Txns duplicated: 0
> Total Txn Lookups: 1
>
> Progress Table: Not configured.
>
> No open handles on queue.
>
> CDR Reliable Queue Manager (RQM) Statistics:
>
> RQM Statistics for Queue (0x13f7c0028) trg_receive Transaction Spool
Name:
> trg_receive_stxn Insert Stamp: 0 Communal Stamp: 0
> Flags: RECV_Q, SPOOLED, PROGRESS_TABLE
> Txns in queue: 0
> Txns in memory: 0
> Txns in spool only: 0
> Txns spooled: 0
> Unspooled bytes: 0
> Size of Data in queue: 0 Bytes
> Real memory in use: 0 Bytes
> Pending Txn Buffers: 0
> Pending Txn Data: 0 Bytes
> Max Real memory data used: 0 (104857600) Bytes Max Real memory hdrs
used 0
> (2276352000) Bytes Total data queued: 0 Bytes Total Txns queued: 0
Total Txns
> spooled: 0 Total Txns restored: 0 Total Txns recovered: 0 Spool Rows
read: 0
> Total Txns deleted: 0 Total Txns duplicated: 0 Total Txn Lookups: 22
>
> Progress Table:
>
> Progress Table is Stable
>
> On-disk table name............: spttrg_receive
>
> Not keeping dirty list.
>
> Server Group Bytes Queued Acked Sent
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
>
> Traverse handle (0x13f5ee028) for thread CDRNrA91 at Head_of_Q, Flags:
> None
> Traverse handle (0x13f5e9028) for thread CDRD_1 at Head_of_Q, Flags:
> None
> Traverse handle (0x13cbbc028) for thread CDRD_1 at Head_of_Q, Flags:
> None
> Traverse handle (0x13cbc9028) for thread CDRD_2 at Head_of_Q, Flags:
> None
> Traverse handle (0x13f5ca028) for thread CDRD_2 at Head_of_Q, Flags:
> None
>
> Thanks again.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ids-bounces@iiug.org [mailto:ids-bounces@iiug.org] On Behalf
Of
> > Habichtsberg, Reinhard
> > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 6:07 PM
> > To: ids@iiug.org
> > Subject: ER queue question [29173]
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > we are using ER to replicate some tables from one to another
database
> server.
> > Version on both is 11.70.FC5.
> >
> > Now I see some replicates where the QUEUE SIZE does not change. My
> > experience is that the QUEUE SIZE always tends to zero.
> >
> > cdr list repl | grep QUEUE
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 122494
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 209272
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 34243
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 33321020
> >
> > Hours later:
> >
> > cdr list repl | grep QUEUE
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 122494
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 209272
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 47332
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 0
> >
> > QUEUE SIZE: 33321020
> >
> > There is one replicate with current activity on the corresponding
> tables where the
> > queue size changes. On the other shown replicates there is no
current
> table
> > activity and in my opinion the queue size should be "0".
> > All replicates are ACTIVE on both database servers.
> >
> > With OAT I can monitoring the following (hope a picture can be send
> and
> > seen):
> >
> > In the header of the "Send Queue Statistics of hzv_tli (Active)"
there
> is shown a
> > "Send Queue (Data in Queue (bytes)" of 5,415. This value changes
> permanently
> > (up and down).
> >
> > In the Target Nodes Table in line grp_dbinthzv (Target Node) in the
> column "Data
> > in Queue (bytes)" we find 35,078,985. This value will never be less
> than about
> > 35,000,000.
> >
> > Is there something going wrong? How can I clear those replicate
> queues.
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > Reinhard
> >
> >
> >
>
************************************************************************
> *******
> > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>
>
>
************************************************************************
*******
> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.

Messages In This Thread

ER queue question
Habichtsberg, Reinhard -- Thursday, 3 January 2013, at 12:07 p.m.
- RE: ER queue question
  Habichtsberg, Reinhard -- Thursday, 3 January 2013, at 12:34 p.m.
  - RE: ER queue question
    Habichtsberg, Reinhard -- Friday, 4 January 2013, at 5:05 a.m.

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 5.12.