Join IIUG
 for   
 

Informix News
18 Nov 13 - ZDNet - Top 20 mobile skills in demand... Read
09 Sep 13 - telecompaper - Shaspa and Tatung have shown a new smart home platform at Ifa in Berlin. Powered by the IBM Informix software... Read
06 Sep 13 - IBM data magazine - Mission Accomplished - Miami, Florida will be the backdrop for the 2014 IIUG Informix Conference... Read
01 Feb 13 - IBM Data Magazine - Are your database backups safe? Lester Knutsen (IBM Champion) writes about database back up safety using "archecker"... Read
14 Nov 12 - IBM - IBM's Big Data For Smart Grid Goes Live In Texas... Read
3 Oct 12 - The Financial - IBM and TransWorks Collaborate to Help Louisiana-Pacific Corporation Achieve Supply Chain Efficiency... Read
28 Aug 12 - techCLOUD9 - Splunk kicks up a SaaS Storm... Read
10 Aug 12 - businessCLOUD9 - Is this the other half of Cloud monitoring?... Read
3 Aug 12 - IBM data management - Supercharging the data warehouse while keeping costs down IBM Informix Warehouse Accelerator (IWA) delivers superior performance for in-memory analytics processing... Read
2 Aug 12 - channelbiz - Oninit Group launches Pay Per Pulse cloud-based service... Read
28 May 12 - Bloor - David Norfolk on the recent Informix benchmark "pretty impressive results"... Read
23 May 12 - DBTA - Informix Genero: A Way to Modernize Informix 4GL Applications... Read
9 Apr 12 - Mastering Data Management - Upping the Informix Ante: Advanced Data Tools... Read
22 Mar 12 - developerWorks - Optimizing Informix database access... Read
14 Mar 12 - BernieSpang.com - International Informix User Group set to meet in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - IIUG Heads West for 2012 - Get ready for sun and sand in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - Running Informix on Solid-State Drives.Speed Up Database Access... Read
26 Feb 12 - BernieSpan.com - Better results, lower cost for a broad set of new IBM clients and partners... Read
24 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Informix Warehouse Accelerator: Continuous Acceleration during Data Refresh... Read
6 Feb 12 - PRLOG - Informix port delivers unlimited database scalability for popular SaaS application ... Read
2 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Loading data with the IBM Informix TimeSeries Plug-in for Data Studio... Read
1 Feb 12 - developerWorks - 100 Tech Tips, #47: Log-in to Fix Central... Read
13 Jan 12 - MC Press online - Informix Dynamic Server Entices New Users with Free Production Edition ... Read
11 Jan 12 - Computerworld - Ecologic Analytics and Landis+Gyr -- Suitors Decide to Tie the Knot... Read
9 Jan 12 - planetIDS.com - DNS impact on Informix / Impacto do DNS no Informix... Read
8 Sep 11 - TMCnet.com - IBM Offers Database Solution to Enable Smart Meter Data Capture... Read
1 Aug 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Happy 10th anniversary to IBM and Informix... Read
8 Jul 11 - Database Trends and Applications - Managing Time Series Data with Informix... Read
31 May 11 - Smart Grid - The meter data management pitfall utilities are overlooking... Read
27 May 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Big data, big time ( Series data, warehouse acceleration, and 4GLs )... Read
16 May 11 - Business Wire - HiT Software Announces DBMoto for Enterprise Integration, Adds Informix. Log-based Change Data Capture... Read
21 Mar 11 - Yahoo! Finance - IBM and Cable&Wireless Worldwide Announce UK Smart Energy Cloud... Read
14 Mar 11 - MarketWatch - Fuzzy Logix and IBM Unveil In-Database Analytics for IBM Informix... Read
11 Mar 11 - InvestorPlace - It's Time to Give IBM Props: How many tech stocks are up 53% since the dot-com boom?... Read
9 Mar 11 - DBTA - Database Administration and the Goal of Diminishing Downtime... Read
2 Feb 11 - DBTAs - Informix 11.7 Flexible Grid Provides a Different Way of Looking at Database Servers... Read
27 Jan 11 - exactsolutions - Exact to Add Informix Support to Database Replay, SQL Monitoring Solutions... Read
25 Jan 11 - PR Newswire - Bank of China in the UK Works With IBM to Become a Smarter, Greener Bank... Read
12 Oct 10 - Database Trends and Applications - Informix 11.7: The Beginning of the Next Decade of IBM Informix... Read
20 Sep 10 - planetIDS.com - ITG analyst paper: Cost/Benefit case for IBM Informix as compared to Microsoft SQL Server... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - IBM Informix Choice Edition V11.50 helps deploy low-cost scalable and reliable solutions for Apple Macintosh and Microsoft Windows... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - Software withdrawal: Elite Support for Informix Ultimate-C Edition... Read
24 May 10 - eWeek Europe - IBM Supplies Database Tech For EU Smart Grid... Read
23 May 10 - SiliconIndia - IBM's smart metering system allows wise use of energy... Read
21 May 10 - CNET - IBM to help people monitor energy use... Read
20 May 10 - ebiz - IBM Teams With Hildebrand To Bring Smart Metering To Homes Across Britain... Read
19 May 10 - The New Blog Times - Misurare il consumo energetico: DEHEMS è pronto... Read
19 May 10 - ZDNet - IBM software in your home? Pact enables five-city smart meter pilot in Europe... Read
17 March 10 - ZDNet (blog) David Morgenstern - TCO: New research finds Macs in the enterprise easier, cheaper to manage than... Read
17 March 2010 - Virtualization Review - ...key components of Big Blue's platform to the commercial cloud such as its WebSphere suite of application ser vers and its DB2 and Informix databases... Read
10 February 2010 - The Wall Street Journal - International Business Machines is expanding an initiative to win over students and professors on its products. How do they lure the college crowd?... Read


End of Support Dates

IIUG on Facebook IIUG on Twitter

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum

Re: RE: RE: I have a puzzling situation

Posted By: Art Kagel
Date: Wednesday, 7 November 2012, at 10:50 a.m.

In Response To: RE: RE: RE: I have a puzzling situation (John Adamski)

John:

I don't see a setuid() call for the user that fails! That is strange!

Art

Art S. Kagel
Advanced DataTools (www.advancedatatools.com)
Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/

Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own opinions
and do not reflect on my employer, Advanced DataTools, the IIUG, nor any
other organization with which I am associated either explicitly,
implicitly, or by inference. Neither do those opinions reflect those of
other individuals affiliated with any entity with which I am affiliated nor
those of the entities themselves.

On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:38 AM, John Adamski <adamski@graceland.edu> wrote:

> Jacques
>
> I got a chance this morning to run tusc for both the uses. If I did it
> correctly here is the output from running it on the two test users.
>
> onstat -g glo
>
> IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 11.70.FC4 -- On-Line -- Up 27 days
> 00:55:54 -- 1076296 Kbytes
>
> MT global info:
> sessions threads vps lngspins
> 0 73 17 0
>
> sched calls thread switches yield 0 yield n yield forever
> total: 1407334795 132198003 1279812992 99794471 6475162
> per sec: 0 0 0 0 0
>
> Virtual processor summary:
> class vps usercpu syscpu total
> cpu 6 41932.54 248.43 42180.97
> aio 1 3.73 12.11 15.84
> lio 1 3.32 9.85 13.17
> pio 1 3.24 10.08 13.32
> adm 1 115.33 67.39 182.72
> soc 5 82.06 241.21 323.27
> msc 1 0.08 0.10 0.18
> fifo 1 3.24 9.87 13.11
> total 17 42143.54 599.04 42742.58
>
> Individual virtual processors:
> vp pid class usercpu syscpu total Thread Eff
> 1 3737 cpu 798.41 31.10 829.51 889.49 93%
> 2 3834 adm 115.33 67.39 182.72 0.00 0%
> 3 3835 lio 3.32 9.85 13.17 13.17 100%
> 4 3839 pio 3.24 10.08 13.32 13.32 100%
> 5 3845 aio 3.73 12.11 15.84 15.84 100%
> 6 3848 msc 0.08 0.10 0.18 0.24 74%
> 7 3860 fifo 3.24 9.87 13.11 13.11 100%
> 8 3889 cpu 1492.38 40.75 1533.13 1598.08 95%
> 9 3891 cpu 1039.38 36.84 1076.22 1104.90 97%
> 10 3893 cpu 14266.45 53.33 14319.78 14456.13 99%
> 11 3899 cpu 11374.88 40.81 11415.69 11620.67 98%
> 12 3902 cpu 12961.04 45.60 13006.64 13176.86 98%
> 13 3903 soc 18.50 52.39 70.89 NA NA
> 14 3904 soc 17.23 51.24 68.47 NA NA
> 15 3905 soc 17.17 51.03 68.20 NA NA
> 16 3906 soc 17.40 51.20 68.60 NA NA
> 17 3907 soc 11.76 35.35 47.11 NA NA
>
> tot 42143.54 599.04 42742.58
>
> tusc -f -o /var/adm/crash/jda_tmp/tusc.log 3834
>
> for ury the one that works I get this:
>
> setgid(140) .............................................. = 0
> setgroups(14, 0xc0000000414ad5f0) ........................ = 0
> setuid(771) .............................................. = 0
> umask(07) ................................................ = 07
> chdir("/home/carsids/ury") ............................... = 0
> execve("/bin/sh", 0xc000000047b213a0, 0xc000000049d91ec0) = 0 [32-bit]
> mmap(NULL, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> -1, 0) = 0x7d7fa000
> open("/usr/lib/hpux32/dld.so", O_RDONLY, 0) .............. = 3
> read(3, "7fE L F 0102010101\0\0\0\0\0\0\0".., 1024) ...... = 1024
> mmap(NULL, 752624, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_SHARED|MAP_FILE|MAP_SHLIB, 3,
> 0) =
> 0xc0040000
> sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE) ................................... = 4096
> mmap(NULL, 7384, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_SHLIB,
> -1, 0) = 0x7d7f8000
> mmap(0x7d7f5000, 12120, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
> MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FILE|MAP_SHLIB,
> 3, 786432) = 0x7d7f5000
> close(3) ................................................. = 0
> mmap(NULL, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> -1, 0) = 0x7d7f2000
> sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE) ................................... = 4096
> stat("/usr/lib/hpux32/dpd", 0x7ffff7f0) .................. = 0
> open("/usr/lib/hpux32/dpd", O_RDONLY, 0) ................. = 3
> fcntl(3, F_SETFD, 0) ..................................... = 0
> mmap(NULL, 16384, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC,
> MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> -1, 0) = 0x7d7ec000
> getdents(3, 0x7d7ec028, 8192) ............................ = 80
> getdents(3, 0x7d7ec028, 8192) ............................ = 0
> close(3) ................................................. = 0
> getuid() ................................................. = 771 (771)
> getgid() ................................................. = 140 (140)
> open("/bin/sh", O_RDONLY, 0) ............................. = 3
> pread(3, "\0\0\002\0\0\0, \0\0\0\aH P \0\0".., 60, 436) .. = 60
> close(3) ................................................. = 0
> utssys(0x7fffec40, 60, 0) ................................ = 0
> procxsec(4, -1, 0x7fffec10, 40) .......................... = 0
> open("/usr/lib/hpux32/libc.so.1", O_RDONLY, 0) ........... = 3
> fstat(3, 0x7ffff730) ..................................... = 0
> read(3, "7fE L F 0102010101\0\0\0\0\0\0\0".., 52) ........ = 52
> pread(3, "7fE L F 0102010101\0\0\0\0\0\0\0".., 1024, 0) .. = 1024
> mmap(NULL, 2987424, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_SHARED|MAP_SHLIB, 3, 0) =
> 0xc0300000
> madvise(0xc0300000, 0x2d95a0, MADV_NORMAL) ............... = 0
> mmap(NULL, 47784, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
> MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_SHLIB,
> -1, 0) = 0x7d7e0000
> mmap(0x7d7d8000, 29796, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_SHLIB, 3,
> 3014656) = 0x7d7d8000
> close(3) ................................................. = 0
> mmap(NULL, 16384, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC,
> MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> -1, 0) = 0x7d7d4000
> open("/usr/lib/hpux32/libdl.so.1", O_RDONLY, 0) .......... = 3
> fstat(3, 0x7ffff730) ..................................... = 0
> read(3, "7fE L F 0102010101\0\0\0\0\0\0\0".., 52) ........ = 52
> pread(3, "7fE L F 0102010101\0\0\0\0\0\0\0".., 1024, 0) .. = 1024
> mmap(NULL, 16080, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_SHARED|MAP_SHLIB, 3, 0) =
> 0xc0004000
> mmap(NULL, 224, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_SHLIB, 3, 65536) =
> 0x7d7fe000
> close(3) ................................................. = 0
> sigsetreturn(NULL, 0x6211988, 48640) ..................... = 0
> mmap(NULL, 3336, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
> 0x7d7f4000
> sysconf(_SC_CPU_VERSION) ................................. = 768
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7ffff7e0, 0x7ffff800) ......... = 0
> brk(0x4001cbc0) .......................................... = 0
> brk(0x4001ebb0) .......................................... = 0
> brk(0x40020000) .......................................... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7ffff800, 0x7ffff7e0) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7fffdad0, 0x7fffdaf0) ......... = 0
> brk(0x40021000) .......................................... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7fffdaf0, 0x7fffdad0) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7fffdad0, 0x7fffdaf0) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7fffdaf0, 0x7fffdad0) ......... = 0
> open("/usr/lib/nls/loc/hpux32/locales.3/en_US.iso88591", O_RDONLY, 0) = 3
> fstat(3, 0x7fffcff0) ..................................... = 0
> pread(3, "7fE L F 0102010101\0\0\0\0\0\0\0".., 1024, 0) .. = 1024
> stat("/usr/lib/hpux32/dpd", 0x7fffc610) .................. = 0
> open("/usr/lib/hpux32/dpd/en_US.iso88591.bpd", O_RDONLY, 0) ERR#2 ENOENT
> mmap(NULL, 5952, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_SHARED|MAP_SHLIB, 3, 0) =
> 0xc0bfe000
> mmap(NULL, 14808, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_SHLIB, 3, 65536) =
> 0x7d7d0000
> close(3) ................................................. = 0
> stat("/usr/lib/nls/loc/hpux32/locales.3/en_US.iso88591", 0x7fffd5c0) = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7fffdad0, 0x7fffdaf0) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7fffdaf0, 0x7fffdad0) ......... = 0
> open("/usr/lib/nls/loc/hpux32/locales.3/C", O_RDONLY, 0) . ERR#2 ENOENT
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7fffdad0, 0x7fffdaf0) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7fffda80, 0x7fffdaa0) ......... = 0
> brk(0x40022000) .......................................... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7fffdaa0, 0x7fffda80) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7fffda80, 0x7fffdaa0) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7fffdaa0, 0x7fffda80) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7fffdaf0, 0x7fffdad0) ......... = 0
> sysconf(_SC_OPEN_MAX) .................................... = 4096
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7ffff7c0, 0x7ffff7e0) ......... = 0
> brk(0x40026000) .......................................... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7ffff7e0, 0x7ffff7c0) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7ffff7c0, 0x7ffff7e0) ......... = 0
> brk(0x4002a000) .......................................... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7ffff7e0, 0x7ffff7c0) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7ffff7e0, 0x7ffff800) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7ffff800, 0x7ffff7e0) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7ffff7e0, 0x7ffff800) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7ffff800, 0x7ffff7e0) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7ffff7e0, 0x7ffff800) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7ffff800, 0x7ffff7e0) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7ffff7e0, 0x7ffff800) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7ffff790, 0x7ffff7b0) ......... = 0
> brk(0x4002c000) .......................................... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7ffff7b0, 0x7ffff790) ......... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x7ffff800, 0x7ffff7e0) ......... = 0
> close(4096) .............................................. ERR#9 EBADF
> close(29) ................................................ ERR#9 EBADF
> close(28) ................................................ ERR#9 EBADF
> close(27) ................................................ ERR#9 EBADF
> close(26) ................................................ ERR#9 EBADF
> close(25) ................................................ ERR#9 EBADF
> close(24) ................................................ ERR#9 EBADF
> open("/dev/null", O_RDONLY, 05030) ....................... = 3
> close(3) ................................................. = 0
> getuid() ................................................. = 771 (771)
> getuid() ................................................. = 771 (771)
> getgid() ................................................. = 140 (140)
> getgid() ................................................. = 140 (140)
> access("/var/tmp", F_OK) ................................. = 0
>
> It goes on a lot more
>
> sury the one that fails I get this:
>
> setgid(140) .............................................. = 0
> setgroups(21, 0xc000000041eab510) ........................ ERR#22 EINVAL
> sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, 0x6000000000363790, NULL) ......... = 0
> alarm(0) ................................................. = 0
> sigaction(SIGALRM, 0x60000000003637e0, NULL) ............. = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, 0x60000000003637c0, NULL) ....... = 0
> sigaction(SIGALRM, 0x6000000000363810, NULL) ............. = 0
> getpid() ................................................. = 2247 (3834)
> exit(131) ................................................ WIFEXITED(131)
> Received signal 18, SIGCLD, in pause(), [caught]
>
> Siginfo: child pid 2247, CLD_EXITED (status 131), si_errno: 0
> pause() .................................................. ERR#4 EINTR
> waitpid(-1, WIFEXITED(131), WNOHANG) ..................... = 2247
> sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, 0x6000000000363580, NULL) ......... = 0
> semop(55, 0x6000000000363590, 1) ......................... = 0
> sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, 0x6000000000363580, NULL) ....... = 0
> waitpid(-1, WIFEXITED(131), WNOHANG) ..................... = 0
> Received signal 14, SIGALRM, in pause(), [caught], no siginfo
> pause() .................................................. ERR#4 EINTR
> time(0xc000000040625c60) ................................. = 1352299862
>
> It looks like the setgroups() is different and not sure what that means or
> where it gets the values from.
>
> John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ids-bounces@iiug.org [mailto:ids-bounces@iiug.org] On Behalf Of John
> Adamski
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 2:49 PM
> To: ids@iiug.org
> Subject: RE: RE: RE: I have a puzzling situation [28715]
>
> Jacques
>
> It probably been 5-6 years since I last used tusc so will take me a little
> to
> clean out the cobwebs in my brain. But I do have a test/DR system I can use
> that usually only has me on it.
>
> I see there are a number of other replies so will go check them out. I
> hope to
> have time tomorrow to figure out tusc and try your suggestion.
>
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ids-bounces@iiug.org [mailto:ids-bounces@iiug.org] On Behalf Of
> JACQUES
> RENAUT
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 1:11 PM
> To: ids@iiug.org
> Subject: Re: RE: RE: I have a puzzling situation [28704]
>
> Original post:
>
> Jim,
>
> Here is the code (sql) using in my test procedure:
>
> drop procedure testsysfail;
>
> create procedure testsysfail()
> returning char(32);
>
> on exception in (-668)
>
> return "Failed, error 668";
> end exception;
>
> SYSTEM " /tmp/test.csh";
>
> return "succeded";
> end procedure;
>
> grant execute on testsysfail to public;
>
> It is based on the production procedure, I just kept the few lines I needed
> that I thought to get a good equivalent procedure. As you can see the
> SYSTEM
> line only has SYSTEM " /tmp/test.csh"
>
> And this is the content of the test.csh script:
>
> #!/bin/csh -f
> ##
> printenv | sort >& /tmp/test.log
>
> id -rg >>& /tmp/test.log
>
> id -ru >>& /tmp/test.log
>
> exit 0
>
> I reran the procedure as both users and get the same results one works one
> doesn't.
>
> I than changed the SYSTEM command to be like your suggestion below "
> /usr/bin/csh -f -v -x -c /tmp/test.sh >& /tmp/test.log ". I get the 668
> error
> on the user that normally works. I also changed the SYSTEM command to go to
> test2.log, still get the 668 error. Then I did a which csh and changed the
> SYSTEM command to use /bin.csh and same results.
>
> If I'm understanding your logic, running csh in the SYSTEM should have
> forced
> a sub-shel - well that doesn't seem to working. Which might imply one user
> is
> getting a sub-shell and the other not. But I can't find any setup that is
> different between the two users.
>
> john
>
> <stuff removed>
>
> Response:
>
> Here's an idea you might try. Assuming you have a test instance where you
> can
> control the activity, you could try using HP-UX tusc utility. You would
> want
> to tusc the adm vp (it's the vp that would be forking and exec'ing the
> system
> command for the sql system command). There's a follow fork option that you
> would want to use (along with others probably) so perhaps you could use the
> tusc output to see if you might spot differences in what each user session
> (the working vs non-working) was doing as the OS level or if there was some
> error in in some of the output that might narrow in on some problem. You'd
> have to run the tusc command as root, and again you'd want to do it on a
> system with limited access so the adm vp wouldn't be doing tons of stuff
> (so
> it's easier to tell the good output vs bad output). I'll go ahead and warn
> you
> the adm vp will generate a decent amount of stuff for signal handling and
> alarm/time output on it's own, but you should also be able to spot where it
> does it's fork and then exec of the shell for the system command and if you
> follow the fork, get output for what you system command is doing.
>
> Jacques Renaut
> IBM Informix Advanced Support
> APD Team.
>
>
>
> *******************************************************************************
> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>
>
>
> *******************************************************************************
> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>
>
>
> *******************************************************************************
> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>
>

--14dae93407478f5a2b04cde9ac23

Messages In This Thread

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 5.12.