Join IIUG
 for   
 

Informix News
18 Nov 13 - ZDNet - Top 20 mobile skills in demand... Read
09 Sep 13 - telecompaper - Shaspa and Tatung have shown a new smart home platform at Ifa in Berlin. Powered by the IBM Informix software... Read
06 Sep 13 - IBM data magazine - Mission Accomplished - Miami, Florida will be the backdrop for the 2014 IIUG Informix Conference... Read
01 Feb 13 - IBM Data Magazine - Are your database backups safe? Lester Knutsen (IBM Champion) writes about database back up safety using "archecker"... Read
14 Nov 12 - IBM - IBM's Big Data For Smart Grid Goes Live In Texas... Read
3 Oct 12 - The Financial - IBM and TransWorks Collaborate to Help Louisiana-Pacific Corporation Achieve Supply Chain Efficiency... Read
28 Aug 12 - techCLOUD9 - Splunk kicks up a SaaS Storm... Read
10 Aug 12 - businessCLOUD9 - Is this the other half of Cloud monitoring?... Read
3 Aug 12 - IBM data management - Supercharging the data warehouse while keeping costs down IBM Informix Warehouse Accelerator (IWA) delivers superior performance for in-memory analytics processing... Read
2 Aug 12 - channelbiz - Oninit Group launches Pay Per Pulse cloud-based service... Read
28 May 12 - Bloor - David Norfolk on the recent Informix benchmark "pretty impressive results"... Read
23 May 12 - DBTA - Informix Genero: A Way to Modernize Informix 4GL Applications... Read
9 Apr 12 - Mastering Data Management - Upping the Informix Ante: Advanced Data Tools... Read
22 Mar 12 - developerWorks - Optimizing Informix database access... Read
14 Mar 12 - BernieSpang.com - International Informix User Group set to meet in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - IIUG Heads West for 2012 - Get ready for sun and sand in San Diego... Read
1 Mar 12 - IBM Data Management - Running Informix on Solid-State Drives.Speed Up Database Access... Read
26 Feb 12 - BernieSpan.com - Better results, lower cost for a broad set of new IBM clients and partners... Read
24 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Informix Warehouse Accelerator: Continuous Acceleration during Data Refresh... Read
6 Feb 12 - PRLOG - Informix port delivers unlimited database scalability for popular SaaS application ... Read
2 Feb 12 - developerWorks - Loading data with the IBM Informix TimeSeries Plug-in for Data Studio... Read
1 Feb 12 - developerWorks - 100 Tech Tips, #47: Log-in to Fix Central... Read
13 Jan 12 - MC Press online - Informix Dynamic Server Entices New Users with Free Production Edition ... Read
11 Jan 12 - Computerworld - Ecologic Analytics and Landis+Gyr -- Suitors Decide to Tie the Knot... Read
9 Jan 12 - planetIDS.com - DNS impact on Informix / Impacto do DNS no Informix... Read
8 Sep 11 - TMCnet.com - IBM Offers Database Solution to Enable Smart Meter Data Capture... Read
1 Aug 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Happy 10th anniversary to IBM and Informix... Read
8 Jul 11 - Database Trends and Applications - Managing Time Series Data with Informix... Read
31 May 11 - Smart Grid - The meter data management pitfall utilities are overlooking... Read
27 May 11 - IBM Data Management Magazine - IIUG user view: Big data, big time ( Series data, warehouse acceleration, and 4GLs )... Read
16 May 11 - Business Wire - HiT Software Announces DBMoto for Enterprise Integration, Adds Informix. Log-based Change Data Capture... Read
21 Mar 11 - Yahoo! Finance - IBM and Cable&Wireless Worldwide Announce UK Smart Energy Cloud... Read
14 Mar 11 - MarketWatch - Fuzzy Logix and IBM Unveil In-Database Analytics for IBM Informix... Read
11 Mar 11 - InvestorPlace - It's Time to Give IBM Props: How many tech stocks are up 53% since the dot-com boom?... Read
9 Mar 11 - DBTA - Database Administration and the Goal of Diminishing Downtime... Read
2 Feb 11 - DBTAs - Informix 11.7 Flexible Grid Provides a Different Way of Looking at Database Servers... Read
27 Jan 11 - exactsolutions - Exact to Add Informix Support to Database Replay, SQL Monitoring Solutions... Read
25 Jan 11 - PR Newswire - Bank of China in the UK Works With IBM to Become a Smarter, Greener Bank... Read
12 Oct 10 - Database Trends and Applications - Informix 11.7: The Beginning of the Next Decade of IBM Informix... Read
20 Sep 10 - planetIDS.com - ITG analyst paper: Cost/Benefit case for IBM Informix as compared to Microsoft SQL Server... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - IBM Informix Choice Edition V11.50 helps deploy low-cost scalable and reliable solutions for Apple Macintosh and Microsoft Windows... Read
20 Jul 10 - IBM Announcements - Software withdrawal: Elite Support for Informix Ultimate-C Edition... Read
24 May 10 - eWeek Europe - IBM Supplies Database Tech For EU Smart Grid... Read
23 May 10 - SiliconIndia - IBM's smart metering system allows wise use of energy... Read
21 May 10 - CNET - IBM to help people monitor energy use... Read
20 May 10 - ebiz - IBM Teams With Hildebrand To Bring Smart Metering To Homes Across Britain... Read
19 May 10 - The New Blog Times - Misurare il consumo energetico: DEHEMS è pronto... Read
19 May 10 - ZDNet - IBM software in your home? Pact enables five-city smart meter pilot in Europe... Read
17 March 10 - ZDNet (blog) David Morgenstern - TCO: New research finds Macs in the enterprise easier, cheaper to manage than... Read
17 March 2010 - Virtualization Review - ...key components of Big Blue's platform to the commercial cloud such as its WebSphere suite of application ser vers and its DB2 and Informix databases... Read
10 February 2010 - The Wall Street Journal - International Business Machines is expanding an initiative to win over students and professors on its products. How do they lure the college crowd?... Read


End of Support Dates

IIUG on Facebook IIUG on Twitter

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum

Re: Slow Query with index

Posted By: John Miller iii
Date: Tuesday, 10 May 2011, at 4:17 p.m.

In Response To: Re: Slow Query with index (Laurie Gustin)

Laurie:

You do not need a stored procedure. The following will work, used the
stores_demo database as an example schema.

select first 100 *
from customer
where lname >= "Miller" and (case when lname = 'Miller' and fname < "Jane"
then 'f' ELSE 't' END)::boolean
order by lname, fname

John F. Miller III
STSM, Embedability Architect
miller3@us.ibm.com
503-578-5645
IBM Informix Dynamic Server (IDS)

ids-bounces@iiug.org wrote on 05/10/2011 11:49:05 AM:

> [image removed]
>
> Re: Slow Query with index [23626]
>
> Laurie Gustin
>
> to:
>
> ids
>
> 05/10/2011 11:55 AM
>
> Sent by:
>
> ids-bounces@iiug.org
>
> Please respond to ids
>
> Thanks for the insight Art!
>
> Still not knowing exactly why this queries performs differently, I took
what
> you said and put it all in a stored procedure that will separate the 'two

> sides of the union' and only do the second half if needed. It returns a
> sub-second response - no matter what part of the alphabet you are in.. or
how
> many records for a single last name.
>
> Thanks for everyone's help on this!!
>
> Laurie
>
> Laurie Gustin
> Database Administrator
> Dept of Technology Services
> Dept of Public Safety
> lgustin@utah.gov
> 801-965-4410
>
> >>> "Art Kagel" <art.kagel@gmail.com> 5/10/2011 11:17 AM >>>
> OK, here's the problem. The optimzer is treating the inequality filter
and
> the equality filters as if this were a UNION of two separate queries. So
it
> is seeing:
>
> select first 100
>
> vo_veh_id, vo_owner_type, vo_first_name, vo_last_name,
> vo_middle_name,
>
> vo_addr_set_id,vehownindex
> from vehicle_owner
> where ((vo_owner_type = 'O' OR vo_owner_type = 'E')
>
> and ((vo_last_name = 'WADSWORTH' and vo_first_name >= 'RALPH')))
> UNION
> select first 100
>
> vo_veh_id, vo_owner_type, vo_first_name, vo_last_name,
> vo_middle_name,
>
> vo_addr_set_id,vehownindex
> from vehicle_owner
> where ((vo_owner_type = 'O' OR vo_owner_type = 'E')
>
> and ((vo_last_name > 'WADSWORTH')))
> order by vo_last_name, vo_first_name;
>
> In order to join the two results sets, remove duplicates, and filter for
the
> first 100 rows, the optimizer must collect all of the matching rows from
> both queries and sort the results. I'm betting that 'ANDERSON' is either
> the smallest value in vo_last_name or there are more than 100 rows with
that
> value in the column and the optimizer knows that, so it is shortcutting
the
> query. It may even be eliminating the second part of the UNION or merging

> the two into a single '<=' comparison if you also eliminated the filter
on
> vo_first_name when you substituted 'ANDERSON'. I don't know because you
did
> not supply the query plan for that version of the query. If you eliminate

> the FIRST 100 clause, does it run faster for 'ROGER' & 'WADSWORTH'?
>
> Art
>
> Art S. Kagel
> Advanced DataTools (www.advancedatatools.com)
> Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
>
> Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own opinions
and
> do not reflect on my employer, Advanced DataTools, the IIUG, nor any
other
> organization with which I am associated either explicitly, implicitly, or
by
> inference. Neither do those opinions reflect those of other individuals
> affiliated with any entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the
> entities themselves.
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Laurie Gustin <lgustin@utah.gov> wrote:

>
> > Thanks for the suggestions...
> >
> > I changed the index, leaving out middle_name altogether and putting
type at
> > the end. Then ran the query without the index directive... below is the

> > query
> > plan. Unfortunately, I no longer have access to the old server to
compare
> > the
> > old query plan...
> >
> > QUERY: (OPTIMIZATION TIMESTAMP: 05-10-2011 10:22:31)
> > ------
> > select
> > first 100
> > vo_veh_id, vo_owner_type, vo_first_name, vo_last_name, vo_middle_name,
> > vo_addr_set_id,vehownindex
> > from vehicle_owner
> > where ((vo_owner_type = 'O' OR vo_owner_type = 'E') and
> > ((vo_last_name = 'WADSWORTH' and vo_first_name >= 'RALPH') or
(vo_last_name
> > >
> > 'WADSWORTH')))
> > order by vo_last_name, vo_first_name
> >
> > Estimated Cost: 751789
> > Estimated # of Rows Returned: 481854
> > Temporary Files Required For: Order By
> >
> > 1) informix.vehicle_owner: INDEX PATH
> >
> > (1) Index Name: informix.idx_vehowner
> >
> > Index Keys: vo_last_name vo_first_name vo_owner_type (Key-First)
(Serial,
> > fragments: ALL)
> >
> > Lower Index Filter: informix.vehicle_owner.vo_last_name > 'WADSWORTH'
> >
> > Index Key Filters: ((informix.vehicle_owner.vo_owner_type = 'O' OR
> > informix.vehicle_owner.vo_owner_type = 'E' ) )
> >
> > (2) Index Name: informix.idx_vehowner
> >
> > Index Keys: vo_last_name vo_first_name vo_owner_type (Key-First)
(Serial,
> > fragments: ALL)
> >
> > Lower Index Filter: (informix.vehicle_owner.vo_last_name = 'WADSWORTH'
AND
> > informix.vehicle_owner.vo_first_name >= 'RALPH' )
> >
> > Index Key Filters: ((informix.vehicle_owner.vo_owner_type = 'O' OR
> > informix.vehicle_owner.vo_owner_type = 'E' ) )
> >
> > The query still took over 2 minutes.
> >
> > When I run the query with the last name of ANDERSEN, it takes about 1
> > second...
> >
> > Thanks
> > Laurie
> >
> > >>> "Art Kagel" <art.kagel@gmail.com> 5/10/2011 9:13 AM >>>
> > Try adding this index and removing the +INDEX() optimizer directive:
> >
> > create index 'informix'.idx_vehowner on 'informix'.vehicle_owner
> > ( vo_last_name asc,
> > vo_first_name asc,
> > vo_owner_type,
> > vo_middle_name asc
> > ) ;
> >
> > If that doesn't work, post the original and new SET EXPLAIN outputs and

> > we'll take a look.
> >
> > Art
> >
> > Art S. Kagel
> > Advanced DataTools (www.advancedatatools.com)
> > Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
> >
> > Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own
opinions
> > and
> > do not reflect on my employer, Advanced DataTools, the IIUG, nor any
other
> > organization with which I am associated either explicitly, implicitly,
or
> > by
> > inference. Neither do those opinions reflect those of other individuals

> > affiliated with any entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the
> > entities themselves.
> >
> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Laurie Gustin <lgustin@utah.gov>
wrote:
> >
> > > IDS 11.50 FC8X4
> > > Linux
> > >
> > > I have a query that has been successfully running on an IDS 10.0 for
> > quite
> > > some time. We recently moved the database to an 11.5 server, and the
> > result
> > > set appears different. For some reason the IDS 10 database seemed to
> > return
> > > the data in index order, even tho the index was not clustered. The
11.5
> > > database did not do that, so when we limited the number of rows
returned,
> > > often the rows we were looking for were not included in the result
set.
> > To
> > > fix
> > > this, I added the 'order by' statement. The result set is now as
> > expected,
> > > however, the query takes up to 2 minutes to complete. The index is as

> > > indicated.. and update statistics have been run using Art's dostats.
> > >
> > > select {+INDEX (idx_vehowner, vehicle_owner)}
> > > first 100
> > > vo_veh_id, vo_owner_type, vo_first_name, vo_last_name,
vo_middle_name,
> > > vo_addr_set_id,vehownindex
> > > from vehicle_owner
> > > where ((vo_owner_type = 'O' OR vo_owner_type = 'E') and
> > > ((vo_last_name = 'WILSON and vo_first_name >= 'RUDOLPH') or
(vo_last_name
> > >
> > > 'WILSON')))
> > > order by vo_last_name, vo_first_name;
> > >
> > > create index 'informix'.idx_vehowner on 'informix'.vehicle_owner
> > > ( vo_owner_type,
> > > vo_last_name asc,
> > > vo_first_name asc,
> > > vo_middle_name asc
> > > ) ;
> > >
> > > The really strange thing is that if I use a name beginning with 'A',
the
> > > query
> > > is screaming fast. The farther into the alphabet you go, the slower
it
> > gets
> > > -
> > > kind of like it is just scanning through the table in order?
> > >
> > > there are 7.8 million records in the table.
> > >
> > > Any suggestions would be helpful!
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Laurie
> > >
> > > Laurie Gustin
> > > Database Administrator
> > > Dept of Technology Services
> > > Dept of Public Safety
> > > lgustin@utah.gov
> > > 801-965-4410
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
*******************************************************************************

> > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --20cf3071d02e3dad8804a2ed66ea
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
*******************************************************************************

> > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
*******************************************************************************

> > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> >
> >
>
> --bcaec54865d22a809b04a2ef21d1
>
>
>
*******************************************************************************

> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>
>
>
*******************************************************************************

> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>

Messages In This Thread

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

IDS Forum is maintained by Administrator with WebBBS 5.12.